Latest

02 Nov 2015 Americas News Comments (1)

Pope Francis to visit Mexico in February 2016

Since the last pontiff visit of Pope Benedict XVI, Mexico have not again had another Pontiff Visit from the Vatican. So anticipation for Pope's visit have so gr…

Read more

29 Jul 2015 Uncategorized No comments

Polish bishops condemn IVF law, warn Catholics to not use process

Poland’s Catholic bishops condemned a law allowing state funding for in vitro fertilization, which was signed into law July 22 by outgoing President Bronislaw K…

Read more

15 Aug 2016 News No comments

Faithful flock to Lourdes under heavy security

Pilgrims began arriving at the shrine before dawn to celebrate the feast of the Assumption Catholic pilgrims from around the world, many sick or disabled, floc…

Read more

31 Aug 2016 Uncategorized No comments

French minister: ‘We are at war with an enemy trying to pit Muslims against non-Muslims’

France's Interior Minister is mounting a bid to unite Muslims and non-Muslims in France as tensions rise following the 'Burkini ban' France’s interior minister…

Read more

02 Jun 2016 Vatican No comments

Archbishop leading US response to Amoris Laetitia says his role has ‘no policy dimension’

Archbishop Chaput said the working group was 'very ad hoc' Archbishop Chaput of Philadelphia, the leader of a new working group of US bishops on implementing A…

Read more

16 Jun 2015 Articles Resources No comments

The Pleasures of Riot

'The urge to destroy is also a creative urge,' wrote the nineteenth century Russian anarchist, Mikhail Bakunin. He might, more accurately, have described it as…

Read more

22 Nov 2016 Articles Comments (1)

There's a secret Catholic message hidden in 'Arrival'

Stop. If you haven't seen the latest sci-fi thriller, Arrival and you plan to do so, read no further. This story contains spoilers. If you've already seen the m…

Read more

09 Jul 2015 Articles Resources No comments

3 dangerous myths that can destroy your marriage

Since the beginning of time, people are given countless advice on what they should anticipate in married life. Some have seen a number of successful marriages a…

Read more

08 Apr 2015 Q&A Comments (1)

Is it okay to use the Anglican Book of Common Prayer?

Full Question As a former Anglican (Reformed Episcopal Church) and now a Catholic, is it okay for me to use the Book of Common Prayer (either the 1928 edit…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
«
»

Are Catholics Cannibals?

Miriam-Webster defines cannibalism as:

1. The usually ritualistic eating of human flesh by a human being.
2. The eating of the flesh of an animal by another animal of the same kind.

Cannibalism implies here the actual chewing, swallowing, and metabolizing of flesh and blood either after or during the killing of a human being; at least, if we stick to definition #1.

Catholics do not do any of this in the Eucharist. Though Christ is substantially present—body, blood, soul and divinity—in the Eucharist, the accidents of bread and wine remain. Here it is important to define terms. When the Church teaches the bread and wine at Mass are transubstantiated into the body, blood, soul and divinity of Christ, we have to understand what this means. The word, transubstantiation, literally means “transformation of the substance." “Substance" refers to that which makes a thing essentially what it is. Thus, “substance" and “essence" are synonyms. For example, man is essentially comprised of body, soul, intellect, and will. If you remove any one of these, he is no longer a human person. The accidents or accidentals would be things like hair color, eye color, size, weight, etc. One can change any of these and there would be no change in the essence or substance of the person.

In the Eucharist, after the priest consecrates the bread and wine and they are, in fact, transubstantiated into the body, blood, soul and divinity of our Lord, our Lord is then entirely present. Neither bread nor wine remains. However, the accidents of bread and wine (size, weight, taste, texture) do remain. Hence, the essential reason why Catholics are not guilty of cannibalism is the fact that we do not receive our Lord in a cannibalistic form. We receive him in the form of bread and wine. The two are qualitatively different.

To dive a bit deeper into this, I would suggest there are at least six reasons why the Eucharist and cannibalism are qualitatively, or essentially, different things.

1. In cannibalism, the person consumed is, generally speaking, killed. Jesus is not killed. We receive him in his resurrected body and we do not affect him in the least. In fact, he is not changed in the slightest. He changes us! This is far from cannibalism.
2. In cannibalism, only part of the victim is consumed. One does not eat the bones, sinews, etc. In the Eucharist, we consume every bit of the Lord, eyes, hair, blood, bones, etc. But again, I emphasize that we do so under the appearances of bread and wine. This is essentially different than cannibalism, which leads to our next point:
3. In cannibalism, the accidents of blood and flesh are consumed. One must tear flesh, drink blood, etc. In the Eucharist, we only consume the accidents of bread and wine. This is not cannibalism.
4. In cannibalism, one only consumes a body, not a person. The person and the soul of the victim would have departed. In the Eucharist, we consume the entire person of Jesus Christ, body, blood, soul and divinity. One cannot separate Christ’s body from his Divine Person. Thus, this is a spiritual communion as well as a physical consuming. We become one with Christ on a mystical level in this sacrament. This is far from cannibalism.
5. In cannibalism, one only receives temporal nourishment that is fleeting. In the Eucharist, we receive the divine life of God through faith and receiving our Lord well-disposed, i.e. we receive everlasting life (cf. John 6:52-55). This is essentially different than cannibalism.
6. In cannibalism, once one eats the flesh of the victim, it is gone forever. In the Eucharist, we can consume him every day and, as mentioned in #1, we do not change him one bit. He remains the same.

Final Thoughts

One always has to be careful when applying terms and concepts to God. Many people miss the mark with regard to the faith because they make the mistake of applying terms in a human way to God who is infinite. We could speak of Mormons who claim God, the Father, has a physical body because the Scriptures speak of God’s “back parts," in Exodus, or “the hand of Lord," the “eyes of the Lord," etc. You’ve probably heard the classic rejoinder to these Mormon claims: “Psalm 91 refers to God’s ‘feathers and wings’. Does this mean God is some sort of bird?"

The error here, of course, is rooted in interpreting texts that were not intended to be used in a strict, literal sense, as if they were. “Back parts" have to mean “back parts," right?

When it comes to the Trinity, some who deny this essential teaching will claim Christians are teaching God to be “three beings" because we say God is “three persons." However, person, as it relates to God, does not mean there are three beings. There is an essential difference between “person" as it relates to God, and “person" as it relates to men and angels.

We could cite a litany of examples containing similar problems.

When it gets down to brass tacks, the nay-sayers who reject the Eucharist, and most specifically, those who accuse us Catholics of cannibalism because we say we “consume" the Lord in the Eucharist, body, blood, soul, and divinity, fail to understand what we actually mean by consuming the Lord. They end up objecting just as the unbelieving “Jews" of John 6:52, who said, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?"

If you are thinking about a cannibalistic blood-meal, he can’t. But if you understand, as Jesus said, “It is the Spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail, the words I have spoken to you are Spirit and life," then you understand. The Eucharist represents a miracle confected by the power of the Holy Spirit.

God can do that.

 

Written By Tim Staples









1 comment

  1. Irl Gladfelter Reply

    This was among the criticisms of Christians in the Roman Empire. I am amazed it has or is coming back today!

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories