Follow usTwitterFacebook

Latest

25 Nov 2015 Middle East - Africa News Comments (1)

LIVE: Pope Francis arrives in Kenya - Watch

Watch a Live coverage of the Pope's arrival in Nairobi (Kenya) at the start of his papal visit to Africa https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrlPqNphfYk

Read more

24 Dec 2014 Q&A No comments

May a couple who marry in the Church, divorce, and later reconcile resume marital relations?

Full Question A husband and wife are validly married in the Catholic Church, and after several years get a civil divorce, never seek an annulment, live cha…

Read more

09 Nov 2014 Q&A No comments

Is there a difference between a presider and a celebrant?

Full Question I've recently seen places in the missalette where it lists celebrant and presider. Doesn't it mean priest or deacon? What do these really mea…

Read more

23 Sep 2015 News USA No comments

Previewing the Pope at the United Nations: a call to abandon no one

In his much anticipated speech at the United Nations headquarters to be delivered Friday, Pope Francis will likely call on the countries of the world not to aba…

Read more

02 Sep 2016 Uncategorized No comments

Archbishop of Canterbury to join Pope Francis in marking 30 years since Assisi

Religious leaders will participate in a three-day event celebrating the first World Day of Prayer The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, will join Pope Fr…

Read more

21 Oct 2015 News Vatican No comments

Sir James MacMillan to compose work for Fátima anniversary

The celebration in 2017 will be attended by Pope Francis Composer Sir James MacMillan has been commissioned by the Shrine of Fátima to write a work for the s…

Read more

31 May 2016 USA Vatican No comments

Pope appoints pastor as new auxiliary bishop for Philadelphia Archdiocese

Mgr Edward Deliman's appointment was announced by the apostolic nuncio to the United States Pope Francis has named Mgr Edward Deliman, who is a priest of the P…

Read more

17 Dec 2015 News USA No comments

A combined Plea of Intervention for Persecuted Christians

On Tuesday, December 15th, the Canadian Rabbinic Caucus and the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops had a joint meeting and have sent an appeal to Stéphane …

Read more

20 Oct 2015 News Vatican No comments

Why the Synod of Bishops is more than Rock’em Sock’em Robots

When you talk to people taking part in the 2015 Synod of Bishops on the family and ask where things stand, one observation you’ll often hear is that public impr…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
«
»

Can a Catholic believe that the U.S. was justified in its decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan during World War II?

Full Question

Can a Catholic believe that the U.S. was justified in its decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan during World War II?

Answer

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states:

"Every act of war directed to the indiscriminate destruction of whole cities or vast areas with their inhabitants is a crime against God and man, which merits firm and unequivocal condemnation." A danger of modern warfare is that it provides the opportunity to those who possess modern scientific weapons—especially atomic, biological, or chemical weapons—to commit such crimes. (CCC 2314; cf. Gaudium et Spes 80)

Under the Catholic understanding of just war, not only must the cause of war be just, but the acts of war used in combat must also be just. The use of weapons to destroy civilian populations, such as the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is an unjust act of war. Terrorizing civilian populations to force surrender, which was part of the U.S. strategy in dropping the atomic bombs, is also an unjust act of war. It is therefore problematic for a Catholic to try to justify the U.S. decision.










17 comments

  1. Sylvia Reply

    I was not quite a year old when this happen. Perhaps it did the right thing and only way to stop the war throughout the world. It is a tough decision to make. It could happen again, who knows.

  2. Loyd McIntire Reply

    Saving thousands of American lives justifies the use of the bomb. Keep in mind that the Japanese attacked us.

    1. Zama Ndefru Reply

      Loyd, doing anything, morally right or not, is fair game for you. You want to tell God that American lives are better than other lives? Tit for tat is the only way to solve a problem?

  3. William A. Shewmake Reply

    What a bunch of bull, the Japs came looking for it in Hawaii. If we would have not dropped the atomic bomb we would have had to invade Japan, you know how many American lives would have been lost because of that. We didn’t start it we finished it. If you need more info read what the French and West Germans have to say about atomic war, they lived through the evils of war. I am Roman Catholic to my core and you can teach the very young about the bomb but I know what happened. I think it’s all the libs in the Church that do more damage than the bomb.

  4. Ajay Singh Reply

    Time to unify beyond our inherited religious and political thought to combat pervasive evil perceptions that condone the basis of terrorism and war.

    Many complicated questions confront the world’s leadership and all leading religious instructors who thirst for a unanimous conclusion for global security in the current predicament of nuclear proliferation, terrorism and war, within the context of the moral crisis in political ethics and religious conflicts.

    (1) Is our world leadership united and coherent enough to combat the sources of terrorism and war given the rise of scientific insights that continue to design and manufacture lethal weapons for mass killing (that is, nuclear weapons)? It is the effect of our genetic nature that forces us to use whatever we have created for individual conceptions of safety and peace.

    (2) Is it possible for the entire world led by God for human beings to uproot the sources of religious conflicts that erupt in the blood of massacre? No! They are enthralled in the strictures of their own religious tradition. It is impossible for them to surrender their own religious profession to transcend their own faiths to fill in the religious gaps that divide human perception.

    (3) Do UN bureaucracies and administrations have enough potential to lead the global community on the path toward peace and propel those in positions of leadership to overcome complicated political issues, humanitarian crises, and religious conflicts?

    (4) Are we safe neglecting these larger issues that force us to an unnatural end?

    (5) Do we have ample, sufficient, and appropriate ideas and resources to combat those masterminds that have converted humankind into “lethal bombs”?

    (6) Regarding these most complicated global issues, we will have to promote the graces of literature to construct a platform whereby the world community (even the common public at large) facilitates a unanimous conclusion of the larger questions confronting the world. There are many possibilities to unify the world community by promoting the graces of literature through academic sources under UN observation.

    Please help us to unify beyond our political and religious inherited thoughts for the perpetuation of peace and solidarity. Only Military operation against brutal religious and political violence, campaigns with separate visions, conversation only for suggestions, or the political and religious demonstration, are not enough at all, to prevent the massacres by terrorism and war.

    Please sign and share this petition to achieve the goals in favor of humanity, which not needs any cost or extra efforts.

    http://www.change.org/petitions/a-policy-for-united-nation-to-reduce-the-cost-of-the-war-on-terrorism-unify-all-the-religious-definitions-within-scientific-insight-and-history

  5. Charles Toshney Reply

    The fact thousands of lives may have been saved by the Atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is something that will forever be quoted in defence of this. I would say that it is up to the individual conscience whether or not this was a necessary act to end a war that had already cost innumerable lives, both civilian and military and was set to claim many more had Japan not surrendered will always be open to debate as it had never before happened in history and God willing it never will as the awesome destruction caused by these weapons is too dreadful to imagine ever being used again.

  6. justin Reply

    Im a korean. Japan was a demon at that era.
    They killed, tortured, raped many civilian.
    They agreed japanese empires policy.
    And no shame or guilt even among civilian.

    Few of them were honest. So ironical that nagasaki was a city many catholic people lived.

    To save many young innocent US soldiers,
    No option but dropping an atomic bomb.

    Of course, if there had been a better way. It shold have been used.

    I think thats the way world going around.

    1. Mary Ann Siebieda Reply

      You are right. It saved an equal amount of Americvan lives and Remember Jesus whipped the money changers and god destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because of it’s evil people. I would prefer god did it but maybe that is why he put us here. Japan is now a thriving city. So yes as a Catholic I can justify the action that ended the war. I was nine years ols at the time and remember how relieved families were. If you remember Japans Emporor told his people it was an act of God when the first bomb was dropped so it became necessary to deop a secind bomb.

  7. Dan Reply

    Ok who ever wrote this must be a DEMOCRAT. If we hadn’t million more lives would be dead during the invasion of Japan.

  8. Zama Ndefru Reply

    Oh the sometime double edgedness of the Holy Bible: Remember Psalm 137:7 Raise it! Raise it! Down to its foundations! will cause one to quibble with this response

  9. Bayerwald-Weihnachtsbaeume Reply

    Faith can move mountains. We have to stop at the past hold special you should look into the world in peace a good future.

  10. Randall Power Reply

    1945… WWII. You need to remember the times. The world was on fire and had been for years. Cities, towns, & villages destroyed by bombs and shells. 10’s of millions killed. Most of Japan’s cities were in ruins and the population was on the verge of starvation. Japan still would not quit. The bombs stopped the war. Millions lived because of them. That is more important than a paragraph in a theological document.

  11. Anthony Reply

    I doubt the catechism was written by a Democrat. It was Democrats who dropped the Bomb in the first place. Fulton Sheen marks that event as the birth of the culture of death.

  12. Gregory Reply

    As a Catholic I am disturbed by this article. I want to assume the writer means well but I fear it borders to heresy. It goes against that quote from Catechism.

    Here are some facts about WWII
    1) Rome joined WWII before US. It invaded Ethiopia in 1935 killing thousands. Others who joined WWII before US are Germany, Russia, Poland and JAPAN. JAPAN invaded China.
    2) Pearl Habor was bombed before Hiroshima/Nagasaki
    3) Hiroshima/Nagasaki didn’t contribute the biggest death statistics (leading casuaties were in USSR, Poland,..)

    So is this author attempting to insinuate that other people are exempted from following this teaching? A person ignoring the contribution of Japan to this war shows a very sadistic mindset.

    Can the writer talk about this without asking his audience whether a Catholic can believe that the JAPAN, Russia and ROME were justified in their decision to kill millions during World War II? Why US only?

    Another related article said that US bishops and priests supported the ‘just war’ by not condemning it. Has this writer learned anything from this or is it just fashionable to use selective justice. Is teaching selective justice not heresy.

    Note I am unequivocally against mass killing.

  13. Wayne Reply

    Hogwash! It saved in the area of hundreds of thousands of American and Japanese lives….. It would have been a blood bath for both sides if we would have had to invade instead of dropping the bomb.

  14. Jonathon Brooks (@JonathonMBrooks) Reply

    It has actually been proven that both of those towns were strategic locations being used for weapon and bomb making. Therefore, it wasn’t “indiscriminate”.

  15. Tony McGurk Reply

    I wonder if people’s opinions would be different if it had’ve been Japan dropping nukes on a couple of American cities to end the war???

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories