Follow usTwitterFacebook


01 Nov 2014 Articles No comments

Eucharist Encyclical

In April 2003, Pope John Paul II released the fourteenth encyclical of his pontificate, Ecclesia de Eucharistia. It focuses “on the Eucharist in its relationshi…

Read more

21 Nov 2014 Q&A Comments (1)

Does the Bible teach reincarnation?

Full Question Does the Bible teach reincarnation? Answer No. Scripture teaches that "it is appointed that men die once, and after this comes judg…

Read more

12 Sep 2015 Europe News No comments

After assisted suicide bill fails, English bishops urge greater care for the dying

A measure that would have legalized assisted suicide in England and Wales failed in the British Parliament Friday by a vote of 330-118, much to the relief of bo…

Read more

28 Jan 2016 News USA Comments (3)

President Obama: "The Rosary makes me think about peace, promoting understanding and ethical behavior"

US President Barack Obama has disclosed that he treasures and still carries around in his pocket, a Rosary given to him by Pope Francis last year. The Rosary…

Read more

05 Oct 2016 News No comments

Albanian president unveils statue of St Teresa in New York

A statue of St Teresa of Calcutta has been revealed at a New York church in front of a large crowd Albanian President Bujar Nishani unveiled a statue of St Ter…

Read more

04 Oct 2016 News No comments

Pope prays at site of devastating earthquake

Pope Francis visited Amatrice, in central Italy, on Tuesday morning Pope Francis has made a surprise visit to the site of the devastating August earthquake in …

Read more

10 Apr 2015 Q&A Comments (4)

If God exists, then wouldn't he be constantly creating? Wouldn't there have to be an initial creation that proved his…

Full Question If with God there is no beginning and no end, and if God is love, then he must be in constant creation. If this is true, there would be unive…

Read more

21 Jan 2016 Articles Comments (6)

Ten Catholic Places to See Before You Die

We are a pilgrim people, and we long to experience the world in all its glorious variety before we pass into the next. So a popular book suggests a thousand pla…

Read more

11 Dec 2014 Q&A Comments (1)

Do those who die in mortal sin get a second chance to repent?

Full Question Does the Catholic church teach that someone dying with mortal sin always goes to hell? With so many unexpected deaths, accidents, there must …

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Christian campaigners welcome Supreme Court ruling against Scottish Named Person scheme

The Scottish government’s scheme ins to appoint a Named Person responsible for the welfare of each child

Christian campaigners have welcomed the UK Supreme Court’s ruling against the controversial Named Person scheme proposed by the Scottish Government.

The scheme aimed to appoint a named adult – usually a teacher or health visitor – as a guardian, looking after the well-being of every child in Scotland. Holyrood approved the scheme as part of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014.

Four charities and three individuals mounted a challenge to the scheme. They included the Family Education Trust, the Christian Institute, Care (Christian Action Research and Education) and the Tyme Trust. They argued that the scheme was intrusive and took away the natural rights of parents.

The five Supreme Court judges, two of whom were from Scotland, said in their unanimous ruling: “There is an inextricable link between the protection of the family and the protection of fundamental freedoms in liberal democracies.” They quoted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”, saying that this is premised on difference: “If we were all the same, we would not need to guarantee that individual differences should be respected…”

The ruling continued: “Individual differences are the product of the interplay between the individual person and his upbringing and environment. Different upbringings produce different people. The first thing that a totalitarian regime tries to do is to get at the children, to distance them from the subversive, varied influences of their families, and indoctrinate them in their rulers’ view of the world. Within limits, families must be left to bring up their children in their own way.”

Norman Wells, director of the Family Education Trust, said: “We warmly welcome the Court’s recognition that the named person scheme represents a disproportionate intrusion into family life and undermines parents.

“Whenever the state assumes responsibility for any aspect of bringing up children, it inevitably affects the way parents view their role. The result is that parents tend to become more passive and take less responsibility for their children. Over time this creates a vicious circle in which more child neglect leads to more state intervention in children’s lives and an ever greater burden on the taxpayer.”

But the Supreme Court has not thrown out the proposed legislation completely. It has given Scottish ministers a 42-day deadline “to address the matters raised in the judgment”, including how teachers, health visitors and other professionals will share and receive information in their role as Named Persons.

The Scottish government has vowed to press ahead with the legislation. Deputy First Minister and Education Secretary John Swinney said: “We will start work on this immediately so we can make the necessary legislative amendments.”


1 comment

  1. Patrick Gannon Reply

    This is wonderful news. I had no idea such efforts were going on, and that civilized people were recognizing the psychological abuse of children that comes at the hands of religion. This may not be the perfect law, and there are always better and worse ways to accomplish a goal, but this is good news of steps in the right direction.
    As for rights of the parents – what about the right of the parent to choose contraception or abortion? When it comes to talk of abortion, all the talk is about the rights of the unborn child – but what about the right of that child to develop enough critical thinking skills in order to properly evaluate the value of its religious indoctrination? If religions truly believed that their message was valid, they would let children grow up enough to understand it before firing synapses over and over again, wiring its beliefs into the brain of helpless children. If there is a Hell, the millstone awaits them. They know that once the child is capable of critical thinking the game is over. We need to protect the rights of children to attain the age of critical thinking before subjecting them to religious teachings. This was a good start, a good effort, and I hope to see many more attempts and eventual successes as society itself learns critical thinking skills and refuses to be cowed by relics of the Iron Age.

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories