Follow usTwitterFacebook


06 Oct 2014 Vatican No comments

Be frank, humble – Pope Francis tells bishops at synod launch

Vatican City, Oct 6, 2014 / 07:45 am .- During the opening session for the extraordinary synod on the family, Pope Francis told participants not to be afraid of…

Read more

06 Nov 2014 Q&A Comments (1)

Is hunting for sport OK?

Full Question I know that we are not to treat animals cruelly and that we are allowed to kill an animal in self-defense, but is it okay to hunt animals for…

Read more

19 Oct 2015 Articles Comments (1)

Patron Saints and how they are Chosen?

The History of Patron Saints The practice of adopting patron saints goes back to the building of the first public churches in the Roman Empire, most of which w…

Read more

04 Mar 2016 Australia News Vatican Comments (1)

Australia's most senior Catholic Cardinal Pell says resigning would be an admission of guilt

Cardinal George Pell, one of the highest-ranking officials at the Vatican, acknowledged his fault in the manner he handled the cases of the sexual abuse of mino…

Read more

15 Aug 2016 Q&A No comments

If you sell a blessed item, is it no longer blessed?

Full Question I once heard that you can sell a blessed item, but if you do, it is no longer blessed. Is this true? Answer A blessed item may be sol…

Read more

02 Oct 2015 Europe News No comments

Irish playwright Brian Friel, former seminarian, dies aged 86

One of Ireland's greatest playwrights, Friel was educated at Maynooth The Irish playwright Brian Friel, a former seminarian, died this morning aged 86. Br…

Read more

14 Jun 2016 News No comments

Orthodox scholars urge leaders to go ahead with council

The scholars said the council is 'an opportunity to commence a new phase of Orthodox witness' 50 Orthodox scholars have signed an open letter to Orthodox leade…

Read more

24 Oct 2015 Middle East News Comments (1)

ISIS declares that no Jew will be left alive (See Details)

The ISIS terrorist sect have declared in a recent released video threatening all Jew. The message was read in Israeli-Arabic language, below is thecontent of th…

Read more

31 Dec 2015 Q&A Comments (2)

Was I wrong to take the host back to my pew?

Full Question I sit in the first row at Mass because I am hearing-impaired. When visiting a church recently, the usher gestured for me to go up for Communi…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Christian campaigners welcome Supreme Court ruling against Scottish Named Person scheme

The Scottish government’s scheme ins to appoint a Named Person responsible for the welfare of each child

Christian campaigners have welcomed the UK Supreme Court’s ruling against the controversial Named Person scheme proposed by the Scottish Government.

The scheme aimed to appoint a named adult – usually a teacher or health visitor – as a guardian, looking after the well-being of every child in Scotland. Holyrood approved the scheme as part of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014.

Four charities and three individuals mounted a challenge to the scheme. They included the Family Education Trust, the Christian Institute, Care (Christian Action Research and Education) and the Tyme Trust. They argued that the scheme was intrusive and took away the natural rights of parents.

The five Supreme Court judges, two of whom were from Scotland, said in their unanimous ruling: “There is an inextricable link between the protection of the family and the protection of fundamental freedoms in liberal democracies.” They quoted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights”, saying that this is premised on difference: “If we were all the same, we would not need to guarantee that individual differences should be respected…”

The ruling continued: “Individual differences are the product of the interplay between the individual person and his upbringing and environment. Different upbringings produce different people. The first thing that a totalitarian regime tries to do is to get at the children, to distance them from the subversive, varied influences of their families, and indoctrinate them in their rulers’ view of the world. Within limits, families must be left to bring up their children in their own way.”

Norman Wells, director of the Family Education Trust, said: “We warmly welcome the Court’s recognition that the named person scheme represents a disproportionate intrusion into family life and undermines parents.

“Whenever the state assumes responsibility for any aspect of bringing up children, it inevitably affects the way parents view their role. The result is that parents tend to become more passive and take less responsibility for their children. Over time this creates a vicious circle in which more child neglect leads to more state intervention in children’s lives and an ever greater burden on the taxpayer.”

But the Supreme Court has not thrown out the proposed legislation completely. It has given Scottish ministers a 42-day deadline “to address the matters raised in the judgment”, including how teachers, health visitors and other professionals will share and receive information in their role as Named Persons.

The Scottish government has vowed to press ahead with the legislation. Deputy First Minister and Education Secretary John Swinney said: “We will start work on this immediately so we can make the necessary legislative amendments.”


1 comment

  1. Patrick Gannon Reply

    This is wonderful news. I had no idea such efforts were going on, and that civilized people were recognizing the psychological abuse of children that comes at the hands of religion. This may not be the perfect law, and there are always better and worse ways to accomplish a goal, but this is good news of steps in the right direction.
    As for rights of the parents – what about the right of the parent to choose contraception or abortion? When it comes to talk of abortion, all the talk is about the rights of the unborn child – but what about the right of that child to develop enough critical thinking skills in order to properly evaluate the value of its religious indoctrination? If religions truly believed that their message was valid, they would let children grow up enough to understand it before firing synapses over and over again, wiring its beliefs into the brain of helpless children. If there is a Hell, the millstone awaits them. They know that once the child is capable of critical thinking the game is over. We need to protect the rights of children to attain the age of critical thinking before subjecting them to religious teachings. This was a good start, a good effort, and I hope to see many more attempts and eventual successes as society itself learns critical thinking skills and refuses to be cowed by relics of the Iron Age.

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories