Follow usTwitterFacebook

Latest

26 Sep 2016 News Comments (1)

Vatican issues new rules for medical panel that judges miracles

Medical experts will no longer be paid in cash and a two-thirds majority will be required to approve miracles In an effort to ensure transparency as well as hi…

Read more

01 Nov 2014 Articles No comments

Ossuary of James - II: Bad Aramaic Made Easy

Written By Jimmy Akin In 2002 a unique archaeological find was announced: a limestone ossuary (bone box) that may have held the remains of James the “brother” …

Read more

12 Sep 2015 Europe News No comments

Cardinal Marx: Pope's annulment reforms don't go far enough

The president of the German bishops' conference has said that the reform introduced in the annulment process by Pope Francis this week "does not solve the funda…

Read more

03 Nov 2014 Q&A Comments (1)

Natural Family Planning - Serious Motives

If, then, there are serious motives to space out births, which derive from the physical or psychological conditions of husband and wife, or from external …

Read more

07 Sep 2016 Uncategorized No comments

‘God’s mercy is for all,’ Pope tells general audience

Pope Francis tells pilgrims not to put limits on the scope of Christ's mercy God did not send his son into the world to cast off the wicked but to offer them a…

Read more

23 Jul 2016 Articles Comments (2)

Why the Crusaders Went

This post is the third in a series about the most prevalent modern myths about the Crusades and how to refute them. Anna Comnena was the thirteen-year-old da…

Read more

02 Sep 2015 News Vatican No comments

Pope's prayer intentions for September 2015

The Vatican has released the prayer intentions of Pope Francis for September 2015. The Pope’s universal intention is: “That opportunities for education and e…

Read more

03 Apr 2015 Q&A No comments

Is it proper to ask publicly for the prayers of a deceased person who is not beatified?

Full Question At a local Catholic school in Baltimore, Maryland, the prayer always ends with "James Cardinal Gibbons, pray for us." Is it proper to invoke …

Read more

03 Aug 2016 News No comments

The Olympics bring us together as ‘one human family’, says Pope

Pope Francis tells general audience that the Olympics brings down barriers between people from different backgrounds A more important prize than a gold medal i…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
«
»

Deluge of criticism after abortion funding revealed in health care law

Washington D.C., Sep 16, 2014 / 02:02 pm .- Pro-life groups have responded forcefully to a new report finding that despite promises from President Barack Obama, more than 1,000 health care plans under the Affordable Care Act cover abortion.

“[T]he President issued an executive order on March 24, 2010 that said: ‘the Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to newly created health insurance exchanges’,” Rep. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) stated on Tuesday. “It turns out that those ironclad promises made by the President himself are absolutely untrue.”

Smith was among numerous pro-life advocates who voiced sharp criticism following a new government accountability report finding abortion coverage in many subsidized health plans in the state exchanges, in violation of promises made by Obama.

Current U.S. laws such as the Hyde Amendment prevent the federal funding of abortion for many government programs. However, the amendment does not apply to the Affordable Care Act, which has its own sources of funding, rather than seeking funding through the annual appropriations bills.

Debates over abortion funding in the 2010 health care law threatened to prevent its passage, as a group of pro-life Democrats said they would only support the legislation if abortion funding were excluded.

In response, President Obama promised an executive order to ban this funding. At the time, numerous pro-life groups warned that the order was legally unenforceable and would have no actual impact on the legislation.

A new report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) now shows that the executive order has in fact not been followed in more than 1,000 health plans across the country.

The report, released Monday night by the independent, nonpartisan agency, reveals the qualified health plans offered on the state exchanges that cover “non-excepted abortion services,” those that do not involve rape, incest or a potential threat to the life of the mother.

In five states – Connecticut, Hawaii, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont – all taxpayer-funded health plans offered cover abortions.

In other states, nearly all qualified health plans offered cover abortions. In Massachusetts, for example, 109 out of the 111 plans offered cover abortions. In New York, 405 out of the 426 plans offered cover abortions. In California, 86 out of the 90 plans offered do so.

The report added that 15 health plan issuers questioned by the GAO affirmed that abortion benefits in their health plans were not subject to restriction.

Enrollees were supposed to be billed separately for their abortion coverage, but the GAO found that this was not always carried out in practice.

“Fifteen issuers and the Washington Health Benefit Exchange,” the report stated, “did not itemize the premium amount associated with non-excepted abortion services coverage on enrollees’ bills nor indicate that they send a separate bill for that premium amount.”

Numerous pro-life advocates voiced their outrage over the GAO’s findings.

“Today’s report is confirmation that ObamaCare is a massive expansion of abortion on demand, paid for by the taxpayers,” stated Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser.

Knights of Columbus head Carl Anderson said the report indicates a “broken promise” on the part of the administration.

“President Obama offered assurances that abortion would not be funded as a result of his health care legislation,” he stated, pointing to Obama’s 2009 statement to a joint session of Congress: “under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions.”

Anderson also charged that “the American people are overwhelmingly opposed to taxpayer funding of abortion,” as indicated by the group’s poll this year which found 58-37 percent opposition.

“Obamacare only had the votes to become law because promises were made that federal funds would not be used to perform these procedures,” Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.) stated.

“Now the GAO has proven that the government has failed to ensure that the insurance issuers are not billing the abortion surcharge separately as required by the law,” she said. “So the question remains, what will the Administration now do to ensure compliance? This must be fixed.”

Legal advocacy group Alliance Defending Freedom insisted that “this report exposes what we’ve known all along: that Obamacare was designed to force Americans to pay for abortions.”

“Federal law protects Americans from paying for others’ abortions, but Obamacare architects built a purposely deceptive accounting scheme into the massive law that makes people in all 50 states fund abortion,” the group said.

House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) called for support of legislation that would explicitly block federal funding of abortions in the health care law.

“Earlier this year the House passed H.R. 7, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, on a bipartisan basis to prohibit federal funding for such purpose under ObamaCare,” he stated. “This GAO report underscores the need for the Senate to do its job and pass this common-sense legislation.”










Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories