11 Dec 2014 Q&A Comments (3)

May deacons anoint the sick?

Full Question In a recent friendly debate, I took the position that deacons cannot administer the sacrament of anointing of the sick. I eventually quoted c…

Read more

01 Apr 2015 Q&A No comments

Can we have our granddaughter baptized if her parents won't?

Full Question Our five-year-old granddaughter is not baptized. Her parents don't seem interested. My husband and I take her to church almost every weekend.…

Read more

20 Apr 2016 Articles Comments (2)

“Bathroom Bill" Is Not Hateful Bigotry

By now you’ve probably heard about celebrities and companies standing up to discrimination and human rights abuses taking place all over the world. Rock s…

Read more

06 Oct 2016 Articles Comments (2)

Threat of World War III grows, but it won't look like you think. Here's how WW3 will be different and…

The political situation between America, Russia and China continues to deteriorate in this fictional scenario. The United Nations tries to broker a peace deal a…

Read more

27 Jul 2016 News No comments

Bruce Willis quoted in new youth guide to Catholic social teaching

The book, also available as an app, includes chapters on God’s providence, the family, and economics A new guide to Catholic social teaching, DoCat, has been l…

Read more

14 Mar 2016 Americas News Vatican Comments (3)

Secretary of State of the United States sends Pope Francis a congratulatory message on his 3rd anniversary as bishop of…

Sunday, 13th March marked 3 years since Buenos Aires Archbishop Jorge Mario Bergoglio became the Bishop of Rome. Secretary of State of the United States, John …

Read more

26 Dec 2014 Q&A Comments (13)

How do I explain that the Catholic Church did not split from the Christian church?

Full Question Someone I know claims that the Catholic Church divided from the "Christian church" around A.D. 900. I know he is incorrect, but how do I expl…

Read more

06 Oct 2014 Vatican No comments

Be frank, humble – Pope Francis tells bishops at synod launch

Vatican City, Oct 6, 2014 / 07:45 am .- During the opening session for the extraordinary synod on the family, Pope Francis told participants not to be afraid of…

Read more

07 Jun 2016 News Comments (1)

Spanish cardinal reported over ‘hate crime’

Critics want Cardinal Antonio Cañizares charged with encouraging a criminal act Feminist groups in Spain have called for the government to prosecute Cardinal A…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Global Warming: philosopher suggests we stop having babies

Global warming is real and getting worse. There is no more credible scientific debate on this issue. However, there is plenty of debate over how we should approach the problem. One professor has offered a provocative solution, stop having children.

Set aside all your opinions for a moment. You may believe global warming is a hoax. That’s fine. But imagine how you would choose in the following scenario.

You are responsible for a group of people on a small island. The people have lived on the island for centuries, and they have brought most of the land under cultivation. The trees and animals on this island are dwindling under the pressure of the growing populace. Leaving the island is not an option.

How would you ensure the island remains capable of sustaining your people for generations to come? Would you limit reproduction? Would you ration consumption? Would you do nothing and leave the populace to their future fate?

This is the problem we seem to face today. According to moral philosophy professor and bioethicist Travis Rieder, from Johns Hopkins University, we must either reduce our reproduction or reduce our consumption.

The problem can be expressed in an equation called the “Kaya identity.” The equation expresses the four factors that are critical to understanding the human impact on climate. The variables in this case measure:

How carbon-rich are our fuels?
How much energy do we need to produce our GDP?
What is the GDP per capita?
And what is our population?

Any increase in these four variables will drive up the Kaya identity, exacerbating our climate problem. However, a decrease can improve things.

The tragic fact is that something has to give. We either need to reduce our population or reduce our consumption. Neither possibility is especially attractive. Both options carry substantial political, moral and ethical costs.

However, the third option is to do nothing.

Four centuries ago, the people of Easter Island overpopulated their island. So many people were stuck on the island and needed to eat, they cut down every single tree on the island for food. When the trees were gone, famine resulted. Conflict and cannibalism followed. Eventually the starving survivors made easy pickings for slave traders.

If you were a chief on Easter Island, what would you do? There are no easy -or right answers.

It’s a sobering question, and one we need to answer while there’s still time.

By Marshall Connolly



  1. Eric H. Reply

    We are still very far from the situation the inhabitants of Easter Island found themselves in. Consider the following before taking a non-Catholic approach and turning to the support of contraception and abortion for population control:

    1. The size of Texas is 268,597 square miles. That’s 909,802,502,280 square feet. Given the current world population of 8,000,000,000 roughly, we could place the entire world population in the state of Texas and everyone would have 1137 square feet to themselves.

    2. We currently produce enough food to feed 12,000,000,000 people. Most of it is wasted by first world nations.

    3. There have been some amazing advances in technology over the last few decades. The greatest of which is development in Graphene, which has the potential to make clean drinking water available to the third world nation’s easily and cheaply. Also, it has the potential to completely reshape out power grid.

    4. Trust in God’s providence is a corner stone of our Catholic faith. If God wants more babies, he will provide the means and the way for them to be here and live. The issue of more people isn’t a ‘problem’ for us to ‘solve’.

    5. This world will end in fire. It is temporal and will not last. We should never even consider reducing the world population for the sake of ‘saving the planet’. To sacrifice even one immortal soul for the sake of something temporal goes against the very core of our Catholic faith.

  2. Patrick Gannon Reply

    What an amazing article to find on a Catholic blog site. Obviously the answer is to support contraception, rather than continue to throw kerosene on the fire and then ask people to give you credit for being a fireman, as the RCC does.

  3. Tom Rafferty Reply

    Population control is necessary from a moral standpoint.

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories