How can we be more accepting of gay people?

By March 16, 2015 5 Comments

Full Question

Most people who are gay feel that they were born that way and cannot change their orientation. They are rejected by society and faith communities. How can we be more like Jesus and accept those who are rejected?


Accepting sinful behavior in other people does them no good. Pointing out the sinfulness is not rejecting them: It’s rejecting what is evil. We owe each other the truth. Because some people with same-sex attractions feel that they were born with such inclination doesn’t make it so. There is no proof for such an assumption. Such people assume they are born homosexual because they can’t remember ever feeling any other way. What we do know is that for whatever reason these people have not identified with the parent of their sex. The prevailing spin that our culture puts on this dynamic is that the culture must adapt to the needs these people perceive they have—to live as though the behavior that such feelings suggest is good and ought to be the norm for them.
Our culture insists that everyone has a right to sexual gratification. Never mind about context; let pleasure be the guide.
The greatest fallacy in such a proposition is that if anyone suggests otherwise, he is passing judgment and rejecting such people outright—as when you ask how we can be more like Jesus and accept those who are rejected. Jesus never accepted sinful behavior. He did accept sinners who were repentant, and he always loved them—even in their most sinful moments.
What is the context in which Jesus matters to us? What is the most important fact that we know about Jesus in relation to us? It is Good Friday! Good Friday is not only the day on which God revealed more about himself than at any other time in the history of creation, it is also our context as followers of Jesus. It is on the cross that Jesus shows us how to live. It is there that he shows us what constitutes love: sacrifice. “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me” (Mark 8:34).
That God would love his creatures enough to become one of them and then suffer and die for them is beyond our ability to comprehend fully. Yet to the degree that we can appreciate what it is to suffer, we can appreciate such love. Each of us is given the opportunity for gaining such appreciation through the crosses that he allows us to have. Many different crosses prevent people from engaging in normal married life and therefore, genital pleasure. Homosexuality is only one of these. Only when we look at our human situation in its proper context, the context of Good Friday, can we recognize our place in it. Only through accepting the cross of same-sex attraction and offering it up in response to his self-gift will such a person know the full embrace of his nail-scarred hands.
It is when we accept the cross in our lives and encourage others to carry theirs that we are more like Jesus—not when we water down his expectations of us!


  • Silvano says:

    Very well said. Even if no one is born with homosexuality, but it is a consequence of one’s life, either fully willing or forced by events out of one’s control, like being sexually abused as a child, homosexuality can be that cross, that God has given to the ones who are professed homosexuals. It is a cross, a suffering, not a licence to sin, mind you, that is the difference, that many people have difficulties in understanding and accepting. We, the non-homosexuals, have the Christian duty to do exactly as in the above given answer, for the love of God. Amen

  • Anonymous says:


  • Love your neighbour as you love yourself. ..Heavenly Father! Forgive our sins as we forgive those who sin against us. By forgiving others, we are getting our sins forgiven..First you remove the log in your eye so that you can see better. Who is not a sinner? By birth we are all sinners. So, let us love them and pray for them so that one day God may change them.

  • Roch says:

    Who wrote the “Answer?” I cannot find anywhere who it is who takes responsibility for it! Contrast and compare it (if indeed there is any comparison) to the answer found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Paragraphs 2358 -2359 quoted in their entirety:
    “The number of men and women who have deepseated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.
    Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection.”
    The “CATHOLIC” SAY answer states: “What we do know is that for whatever reason the person did not identify with the parent of their sex.” This statement is only pop – psychology and there is insufficient proof to support it. In addition, no scientific proof exists that can stand up to scrutiny that any homosexual person has been converted to heterosexuality! Consequently they have no choice but “… are called to chastity.”

Leave a Reply Brethren !