11 Nov 2014 Q&A Comments (2)

Does abstinence from meat include byproducts of animals, such as eggs, cheese, and milk?

Full Question Does abstinence from meat include byproducts of animals, such as eggs, cheese, and milk? Answer At one time Lenten abstinence from …

Read more

17 Sep 2016 News Resources Comments (3)

God, by any other name, would be just as great - unless you're Muslim: Cardinal claims Christians and Muslims do…

The Bible tells us God is known by many names and people around the world believe many religions worship the same Lord in their own way - but one Cardinal claim…

Read more

12 Apr 2016 Q&A Comments (4)

What if I forgot to confess a sin and remembered it later? Was it absolved?

Full Question If I cannot recall if I mentioned a particular sin the last time I went to confession but recall it now, should I mention it in my next confess…

Read more

10 Nov 2015 Americas News Comments (1)

Catholic nun wins competition on Food Network's reality cooking show

Sr. Alicia Torres, a member of the Chicago-based Franciscans of the Eucharist competed on the Food Network Show “Chopped" last Monday and won the competition. …

Read more

06 Sep 2016 Uncategorized No comments

Official portrait of Mother Teresa unveiled in Washington

Catholic organisations in Washington DC celebrated the canonisation of St Teresa via public exhibitions A portrait of St Teresa of Calcutta was unveiled at the…

Read more

13 Sep 2016 Europe News USA Vatican No comments

Three women charged over Notre Dame Cathedral gas canister plot

The women were charged with criminal terrorist association linked to the discovery of the car filled with gas cylinders Three women accused of being part of an…

Read more

15 Sep 2016 Europe News USA Vatican No comments

ISIS slaughtered French priest declared a martyr by Pope Francis

When French priest Fr. Jacques Hamel was murdered mid-Mass by two ISIS members, the world was shocked. "Father Jacques Hamel had his throat slit on the cross…

Read more

26 Apr 2016 Articles Comments (1)

Correcting Media Portrayals of Prince’s Faith

The recent passing of music icon Prince has motivated many people to look at a once little-known fact about his life: his faith. Though he was baptized a Sevent…

Read more

24 Dec 2014 Q&A Comments (5)

Do devout Jews believe in purgatory?

Full Question I was told that devout Jews believe in purgatory. Is this true? Answer In essence, yes, though they do not call it purgatory. Jews …

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

How to Eliminate Pornography

Newspaper, magazine, and online commentators have served up any number of reasons for the hatred underlying terrorist attacks. Many of them say the root of the problem is that terrorists resent American prosperity. I remember when a recent president said, “They hate us for our freedoms." I doubt it. Terrorists don’t care, one way or the other, about our Bill of Rights.

I don’t recall demonstrations against the right of Americans to assemble peaceably, to petition for redress of grievances, or to engage in free speech. Why should someone in Saudi Arabia, Iraq, or Afghanistan care whether you can complain to your alderman without being sent to jail?

Similarly with the prosperity argument. Decades ago, many Americans thought the superiority of our system over the Soviet Union’s was established by a count of color television sets and washing machines. That was dumb then, and it is dumb now to think that a peddler of trinkets in Kabul resents America because we live in houses with piped water and he doesn’t.

Commentators are closer to the truth when they say America is hated largely because of its perceived cultural decay—pornography, immodest dress, and abortion top the list—which it insinuates into societies around the world. Our freedoms and possessions do not impinge on the lives of those who hate us. Our culture does. If we really were serious about returning to the old verities, we would do more than hoist a flag or affix a bumper sticker. We would repent corporately and deeply.

Think how refreshing it would be to do something that would show the whole world, including ourselves, that we have undergone an authentic conversion. However successful America’s military campaign against terrorism, long-term peace will not come unless we fix things on the home front. How about taking just one of the issues that our opponents in Muslim countries cite, pornography?

A modest proposal

We have been in the midst of a “war against pornography" for several decades. Has anyone noticed any retreat by the enemy? There may have been some improvement in this town or that, but, on the whole, pornography is more widespread today that ever. Politicians wring their hands, unable to think of what to do to return us to the relatively innocuous atmosphere of, say, the 1950s.

It’s easy, folks. Pornography could be eliminated—or at least greatly reduced—in a matter of weeks, if there were the political will. I have a proposal. It doesn’t involve another commission. It doesn’t involve deciding at what age young people may appear in pornographic movies. It doesn’t involve moving adult bookstores further away from schools. It involves the radically Christian approach of simply not putting up any longer with the intolerable.

I work from the premise that pornography, being thoroughly immoral, can have no civil justification. It doesn’t have a right to exist, in any form and at any level, and no one can have a right to engage in it or to profit from it. Any profits gained are illicit profits.

I also work from the premise that there is no slippery slope. Getting rid of pornography will not endanger legitimate movies or literature. Good movies will not disappear if X-rated movies cease to exist. Good books will not vanish from the shelves if “adult" bookstores are eliminated. Lines can be drawn: on this side, legitimacy; on that side, illegitimacy. (The Supreme Court repeatedly has declared that the First Amendment does not protect obscenity, and what is more obscene than pornography?)

So here is my plan: The president issues an executive order proclaiming that not only does the Constitution not in any way protect pornography but that pornography is identifiable, aside from the ludicrous Supreme Court decisions about having to find a lack of any redeeming social value. The president instructs civil authorities to seize immediately all the assets of all producers and distributors of pornography. I mean this in two senses.

First, such operations as Playboy and Vivid Entertainment are shut down overnight. Their inventory is mulched and recycled. Their physical plants and video equipment are sold off piecemeal to the highest bidders. Every adult bookstore is closed down and its inventory similarly disposed of. Pornographic movies are confiscated and destroyed. Pornographic websites are zapped into the void, at least those based in the U.S.

Then the personal assets of those who have grown rich from pornography are taken. (No one has a right to ill-gotten gains.) Leave the Hefners and the rest with whatever the bankruptcy courts normally leave petitioners. The bulk of the pornographers’ assets can be liquidated and the funds used to underwrite, say, chastity programs.

An exercise in nostalgia

Is my proposal contrary to the First Amendment? As currently interpreted, yes. But I don’t give a hoot about current interpretations. I do give a hoot about truth and beauty and love and common sense, all of which are violated by pornography. Would the overnight diminution of pornography end the threat from Islamic terrorists? No, but it would be a good first step, and it would be worth doing even if there had been no September 11.

Is my proposal practical? Not in the least. There is as much chance of it being carried out as there is of my singing the lead in a Broadway musical. I make the proposal not in any expectation that any president or legislator would give it a second thought—or even a first thought. They wouldn’t because my fellow Americans wouldn’t stand for any such proposal because most of them like or at least tolerate pornography. Those who are addicted to it don’t want to be freed from their addiction (at least that’s true for most of them). Most of the rest see no real harm in it. Even most opponents of pornography aren’t willing to back anything that would make a dent in the problem.

So, as a practical matter, my proposal is useless, except as a talking point. I make it only to argue that if there really were a will, there’d be a way. Call it an exercise in nostalgia. I’d settle for returning to the status quo ante of my childhood. Pornography wasn’t nonexistent then, but it was hard to locate and hadn’t yet poisoned the minds and hearts of the majority of Americans. I’m not expecting Eden, but I’m weary of Gomorrah.

By Karl Keating



  1. CJ Reply

    Yes! Catholics have got to get their ‘fight’ back and get creative to kick back the devil from our hearts and our culture. We’ve also got to be in prayer – rosary prayer. Error has no rights. Thank you for this article.

  2. Patrick Gannon Reply

    So the President should be able to decide on his/her own what is pornographic and have it all destroyed?
    Suppose the President takes this executive power and decides that the RCC’s maniacal obsession with sex is pornographic and orders that all Catholic places of worship be destroyed, or taken over by local or federal governments… Hmm – that might actually make this country a better place to live.
    Mr. Keating would surely be much more at home in Saudi Arabia – perhaps he should go there and get out of the bedrooms of the rest of us.

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories