Latest

11 Feb 2016 Articles No comments

The Heart's Darkness

Saturn Devouring His Son (1819) by Francisco Goya. Located in the Museo del Prado, Madrid, Spain. For a so-called “Romantic," the great Spanish painter…

Read more

31 Oct 2014 Articles Comments (2)

Prayer, Science, and the Existence of God

Can science find God? If God is defined as a being (or perhaps “the ground of being") that is neither composed of matter nor confined to a spatial location, the…

Read more

30 Aug 2016 Uncategorized No comments

Prosecutor undecided on death penalty after killing of nuns

The nuns' order has said it opposes the death penalty and said the sisters' murders do 'not demand revenge' A Mississippi prosecutor said she hasn’t decided wh…

Read more

26 Oct 2014 Vatican Comments (1)

'What is being proposed is not marriage' – Pope calls for defense of family

Vatican City, Oct 26, 2014 / 12:52 pm .- In an audience with members of an international Marian movement, Pope Francis warned that the sacrament of marriage has…

Read more

30 Sep 2016 News No comments

Matthew forms in the Caribbean and will track over Bahamas. Will Florida be hit?

Tropical storm Matthew has formed in the Caribbean and appears likely to brush the east coast of Florida. The storm is on track to strike most of the islands in…

Read more

25 Oct 2014 Vatican No comments

Sistine Chapel being used as sacred place – not 'venue for private parties'

Vatican City, Oct 25, 2014 / 07:30 am .- Director of the Vatican Museums Antonio Paolucci has rejected rumors that they are now renting the Sistine Chapel, addi…

Read more

21 Oct 2014 Q&A Comments (6)

Is it wrong to study the I Ching?

Question I am aware the Church is against fortune-telling and astrology, but isn't the I Ching all right? I mean, it’s a Taoist holy book. Answer It is not a…

Read more

29 Mar 2015 Q&A No comments

Is there a way I can communicate with my deceased father?

Full Question My father died eight years ago, leaving behind a dysfunctional family. I have not gotten over his death: At the end I ignored some phone call…

Read more

16 Jun 2015 Articles Resources No comments

Why I Am A Catholic

I could fill all my space with separate sentences each beginning with the words, "It is the only thing that…" As, for instance, (1) It is the only thing that re…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
«
»

Is the story of the good thief in Luke 23:39–43 proof that baptism isn’t necessary?

  • Written by:
  • 1 Reply

Full Question

Is the story of the good thief in Luke 23:39–43 proof that baptism isn’t necessary?

Answer

First, it isn’t clear that baptism had yet been mandated by Jesus before he met the thief. If it had been, we do not know for certain that the thief hadn’t already been baptized. In any case, the thief clearly underwent a conversion at some point during his crucifixion, and it seems evident that he would have desired baptism before his death had he known of its necessity. That would have been sufficient, because the Church recognizes that, in such a case, the desire for baptism brings about the fruits of baptism (CCC 1258).


Jim Blackburn









wpsd_autopost:
1

1 comment

  1. Patrick Gannon Reply

    Do Catholics understand the implications of this? What it means is that innocents who are aborted, miscarried or stillborn who commit the grievous crime of dying before being baptized go to Hell by default. The catechism says that it knows of no way to salvation outside of baptism. What does this mean? It means that an all-powerful god sends completely innocent souls to Hell. They have no means by which to desire baptism – they don’t know anything about it. They are going to Hell. Now the Church says you can believe in Limbo, an unofficial doctrine, but it still denies salvation, and the mother who loses her unborn baby will never see it unless perhaps she goes to Hell as well. The Church also permits you to “hope” that your god isn’t a complete monster who sends innocents to eternal torment – but it’s a very thin hope and is not part of the formal catechism.
    .
    Fortunately the DNA evidence almost certainly eliminates the possibility of a 2-person DNA bottleneck, thus there was no Adam and Eve and no talking snakes, no fall from grace, no original sin, no need to believe, say and do the right things in order to be saved by Jesus.
    .
    By the way, we know that Yahweh can remove original sin or prevent it if he chooses to. The Church decided in 1854 that he did that for Mary, so he could do it for anyone, but apparently chooses not to do so, preferring that all those aborted, miscarried and stillborns go to Hell. Nice guy, that Yahweh.

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories