05 Jul 2016 Q&A No comments

Are we close to the kingdom of God when we receive the Eucharist?

Full Question I recently read a book claiming that we are close to the kingdom of God while receiving the Eucharist. What does this mean, and how close are…

Read more

25 Jun 2016 Europe News USA Vatican No comments

European Church leaders fear consequences of Brexit vote

European Catholic leaders have expressed concern that the decision by British voters to leave the European Union threatens unity across the continent, but they …

Read more

19 Nov 2014 Q&A Comments (3)

If Jesus didn't believe the Bible was the sole rule of faith, why did he quote it in his…

Full Question If Jesus didn't believe the Bible was the sole rule of faith, why did he quote it in his disputes with the Pharisees and the Sadducees? …

Read more

19 Aug 2016 Q&A Comments (2)

How did the dinosaurs become extinct if death didn't enter the world until the Fall?

Full Question If we are to believe that the earth wasn't created in seven literal days but over millions of years, how do we reconcile the theology of deat…

Read more

26 Dec 2014 Q&A No comments

Hasn't the Church destroyed an entire continent by preaching against condoms for protection from AIDS?

Full Question How can you people look at yourselves in the mirror knowing that you have basically destroyed an entire continent by spreading your message t…

Read more

16 Jun 2016 Articles Comments (2)

Non-Catholics in the Communion Line

There are usually a few Masses per year at which there can be expected to be a large number of non-Catholics present. Christmas and Easter Masses are popular wi…

Read more

26 Feb 2016 Australia News Vatican Comments (2)

Cardinal Muller on proselytism, "Sometimes a silent witness is the best witness of the love of God"

Cardinal Gerhard Müller of Germany, Vatican's Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith says proselytism 'is practically a manipulation of the c…

Read more

08 Aug 2016 Q&A Comments (1)

Can you provide an actual quote by Pope John Paul II that states that life begins at conception?

Full Question Can you provide an actual quote by Pope John Paul II that states that life begins at conception? Answer Sure: Some people try to jus…

Read more

23 Mar 2015 Q&A No comments

What is the relationship between the Church and baptized Protestants?

Full Question What relationship does the Catholic Church perceive to exist between itself and various Protestants (the baptized ones who st…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Modification of Human Embryo condemned by Pro-Life Charity

The decision of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) to permit a British scientist to genetically modify human embryos has been highly decried by the Pro-Life Charity. This implies allowing the Francis Crick Institute in London to carry-out the experiment of editing the human DNA.

If the British Scientists should carry-out the experiemnt, it would be the second of such experiment. The first one was conducted in China, last year.

As it stands presently, the HEFA has approved a license for a Francis Crick Scientist, Kathy Niakan in order to give him the ability to to perform ‘genome editing’ on human embryos. The scientists are aiming to gain a deeper understanding of the earliest moments of human life.

The research, which will look at the fertilised egg’s development from a single cell to around 250 cells in the first seven days after fertilisation, may help scientists gain a better understanding of why some women lose their babies before term.

It will be illegal for the scientists to implant the modified embryos into a woman; however, critics have previously warned that the procedure will lead to designer babies and the destruction of embryos.

The Education Director of Life, Anne Scanlan said that the decision taken by the HFEA “ignored the warnings of over a hundred scientists worldwide".

“The HFEA now has the reputation of being the first regulator in the world to approve this uncertain and dangerous technology," said Scanlan.

“It has ignored the warnings of over a hundred scientists worldwide and given permission for a procedure, which could have damaging far-reaching implications for human beings. We do not know what long term side effects the tampering with some strands of DNA could have on other strands. However once genetic changes have been made they will be irreversible and handed down to future generations." Scanlan added

“We are also concerned that such controversial intervention in the human germline opens up the very real possibility of eugenics where the existence of human beings becomes conditional on the possession of certain physical characteristics.

“Whilst we note the HFEA restriction on the implantation of genetically modified embryos, it is sending the wrong signals by allowing scientists the ability to develop and possibly perfect the technology here in the UK. To mitigate any advancement on the potentially dangerous work being undertaken by these British scientists, we believe that an international ban on human DNA editing is urgently needed to protect the future of the human species." Miss Scanlan said.



Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories