Latest

27 Dec 2014 Q&A Comments (1)

How do we know that Jesus descends from David as prophesied?

Full Question How do we know that Jesus descends from David as prophesied? Matthew's Gospel tells us about Joseph's genealogy, but he was not Jesus' biolog…

Read more

07 Sep 2016 Uncategorized No comments

President of Poland asks church leaders to protect Poles living in the UK

Poland's President Andrzej Duda has asked Cardinal Nichols to support better protections for Poles Poland’s President Andrzej Duda has written to church leader…

Read more

23 Sep 2014 Vatican No comments

Cardinal Burke: Media hijacking Synod on the Family

Vatican City, Sep 23, 2014 / 04:04 am .- Next month's Synod on the Family has undergone an attempted hijacking by some media sources, which are fueling expectat…

Read more

03 Oct 2015 Articles No comments

Letters from the Synod: October 2, 2015

Reports and commentary, from Rome and elsewhere, on the XIV Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops DISQUISITIONS …being thoughts on Synod 2015 fr…

Read more

07 Jul 2016 Europe News USA Vatican No comments

Vatileaks verdict in: priest and PR expert found guilty of leaking documents

Spanish priest Mgr Angel Lucio Vallejo Balda and public relations expert Francesca Chaouqui have been found guilty of conspiring to leak private Vatican documen…

Read more

02 Sep 2015 Europe News No comments

German bishops’ conference: grant sanctuary to refugees only as a last resort

As thousands of migrants and refugees enter Europe from Africa and Asia, the migration commission of the German Bishops’ Conference has published a brief docume…

Read more

03 Nov 2014 Q&A Comments (2)

Can the Church change its doctrines?

Full Question I was amazed to read recently where a Catholic priest theologian said that the Church is not infallible and that it has changed its doctrines…

Read more

22 Oct 2015 Europe News No comments

Fears grow among Christians in Nepal

Concern about security is growing following the bombing of three churches Fears are growing among Christians in Nepal about their future security, according …

Read more

31 Aug 2014 Vatican No comments

Pope Francis takes to Twitter in appeal for Iraqi citizens

Vatican City, Aug 11, 2014 / 05:55 am .- Since Friday Pope Francis has been tweeting three times a day asking faithful and parishes to pray and offer material s…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
«
»

Pope Benedict’s Speech points caught clearer, after ten years

Today marks the tenth anniversary of perhaps the most controversial papal speech of the last half-century, an address given by emeritus Pope Benedict XVI in Regensburg, Germany, in 2006, which sparked a firestorm of protest across the Islamic world.

In the opening section of the speech, Benedict cited a 14th century dialogue between a Byzantine emperor and a Persian, in which the emperor said provocatively: “Show me just what Mohammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

Taken in tandem with Benedict’s preexisting image as an arch-conservative and cultural warrior, the citation was shot out of a media cannon with deadly consequences. An Italian nun was shot to death in Somalia, churches were firebombed on the Gaza strip, and the pontiff was burned in effigy in the streets of Ankara.

When he traveled to Turkey just two months later, he was constrained to send signals of friendship with Muslims at every turn, and his spokesmen were almost desperate to insist the pontiff did not intend to launch a new crusade.

Among Vatican-watchers, the speech was taken as a massive stumble, perhaps indicative of a traditionalist pope out of touch with the ethos of inter-religious respect that had already become official Catholic teaching.

Ten years later, there’s a mounting sense that perhaps the world owes Benedict an apology. The rise of the Islamic State, Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram, and other extremist Islamic movements, and the continual waves of terror and barbarism they generate, has created a sense that perhaps it wasn’t Benedict who stumbled by pointing out that Islam has a problem – perhaps it’s Muslims who haven’t responded to the problem adequately.

Lost in the noise, however, is the central thing to know about the Regensburg speech, to wit: It’s not really about Islam at all.

In the 4,500-word address, Benedict devoted barely three paragraphs to the remark quoted above from Manuel II Paeologus, which he used to set up his reflections on the topic, which was “Faith, Reason and the University." He was trying to make a point about the importance of religion never parting company with reason, and could just as easily have taken his cautionary tale from Hinduism, Buddhism, or, for that matter, Christianity.

Benedict’s real target in the speech is the West, identifying two worrying trends he saw (and no doubt still sees) in Western thought – one inside the Christian church, and the other in the broader culture.

He devoted a significant chunk of the Regensburg speech to tracing the history of efforts at “dehellenization," meaning to suggest that the use of ancient Greek concepts of reason in the early Church was really just an historical accident, and there’s nothing essential about them to the Christian faith.

Benedict insists that salvation history doesn’t work that way, and that it was providential that the Biblical faith and Greek thought intersected. It marked a fundamental choice by Christianity, he believes, to recognize that reason is intrinsic to God’s nature, and that to act irrationally is therefore to break with God’s will.

Benedict was even more critical of trends in Western culture to regard only the so-called “hard sciences" as truly rational, meaning objective, and to relegate everything else – including morality – to the realm of personal preference and choice.

That’s a disaster, he argued, because it leaves no basis for moral consensus on anything, and thus makes building a real community impossible. If there’s no objective good, then what’s to stop the powerful from abusing the weak, what’s to stop a tyrannical majority from oppressing a minority, and on and on?

He also, by the way, argues that the exclusion of ethics and faith from the realm of reason also damages inter-religious dialogue, because “the world’s most profoundly religious cultures see this exclusion … as an attack on their most profound convictions."

That, surely, is not the rhetoric of a crusader.

Finally, Benedict argues that there are certain points empirical science presuppose, such as the rational mathematical structure of the universe, that it can’t explain by itself, and it’s not irrational to ask how things got that way in the first place.

“The West has long been endangered by this aversion to the questions which underlie its rationality, and can only suffer great harm thereby," he said, calling for the “courage to engage the whole breadth of reason, and not the denial of its grandeur."

Put as simply as possible, Benedict was arguing at Regensburg that the choice for faith is not irrational, and that currents in the West that style it as such are the real enemies of enlightenment and progress.

One can dismiss that argument out of hand, challenge it on certain points, or decide it needs more reflection. What you can’t do, however, is present it as a treatise on Islam and its discontents, because the discontents Benedict was worried about are percolating in a very different part of the world and a different cultural milieu.

On this tenth anniversary of the Regensburg speech, much of the world may indeed owe Benedict an apology, but it’s not for disagreeing with his argument a decade ago … it’s for missing his point entirely.

By John L. Allen Jr.









wpsd_autopost:
1

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories