Follow usTwitterFacebook


26 Sep 2016 News No comments

Mark Wahlberg planning biopic of ex-boxer who became a beloved priest

The actor is teaming up with director David O Russell on a screenplay about Fr Stuart Long's life Mark Wahlberg is an unusual figure in Hollywood: an acting su…

Read more

04 Nov 2016 News No comments

Prisoners to be Pope’s VIP guests for jubilee celebration

Sunday's special Jubilee for Prisoners will be celebrated at the Vatican, drawing detainees and their families from around Italy and beyond, including Cincinnat…

Read more

08 Jul 2015 Articles No comments

Papal fallibility and infallibility

A museum curator showed me a contemporary copy of the papal bull "Inter Caetera" by which Pope Alexander VI divided the world between Spain and Portugal with a …

Read more

08 Nov 2014 Q&A Comments (5)

Does the Sunday observance begin on Saturday evening, in imitation of the Jewish sabbath?

Full Question In ancient Judaism the sabbath was from sundown on Friday to sundown on Saturday. If Sunday is the Christian sabbath, should we celebrate it …

Read more

01 Oct 2014 Vatican No comments

Family synod an opportunity to support marriage, scholars urge

Vatican City, Oct 1, 2014 / 04:07 am .- Law professors, family advocates and clergy have asked those participating in the upcoming synod of bishops to consider …

Read more

08 Mar 2016 News Vatican No comments

Pope Francis to preside over public consistory to approve canonization of 'Saint of the Gutters'

The Vatican has announced that the Holy Father will convene over an ordinary public consistory of cardinals on March 15 where he is expected to sign the decrees…

Read more

09 Mar 2016 Europe News United Kingdom USA Vatican Comments (1)

Britain's Catholic Church leader says Government's tactics to combating terrorism risk doing extreme damage

The leader of the Catholic church in England and Wales, Cardinal Vincent Nichols shared his reflections during a lecture last night and said that the Government…

Read more

05 Oct 2015 News Vatican No comments

Pope opens Synod of Bishops with call to blend tradition with mercy

Pope Francis opened this year’s Synod of Bishops on the family Sunday with a stirring defense of traditional marriage coupled with an insistence that the Church…

Read more

16 May 2016 USA No comments

Alabama governor praised for signing bill to ban dismemberment abortions

Gov Robert Bentley signed a second bill that prohibits abortion clinics from operating within 2,000 feet of schools Alabama Gov Robert Bentley last week signed…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Asking the Right Question About Islam’s God

In the wake of last week’s suspension of a professor at (evangelical) Wheaton College for her public statement that Christians and Muslims worship the same God, the question of whether we do, in fact, has been making its rounds again on blogs and in journals. Many smart Christians have been coming down on one side or another, or meta-analyzing others’ arguments to distill what seem to be the best ones.

I don’t think all this is without value as a thought exercise or conversation-starter. But I do think that to ask simply, “Do Christians and Muslims worship the same God?” in search of a yes or no answer is to ask the wrong question.

A common problem in any conversation is the failure to define terms. We use words to communicate, but verbal communication works only when the parties to the discussion share the same, or at least similar, notions of the things to which the words refer, be they physical objects or metaphysical concepts. And often the latter have contextual meanings or shades of meaning that have to be worked out and mutually understood before any real meeting of the minds can take place.

For example, before two people can fruitfully discuss the question “Is man free?”, they need a common working concept of what freedom is, and what it would mean to say that a man exercises or possesses it. This takes time, work, and good will, so unsurprisingly it often doesn’t happen. What results is arguing at cross-purposes—two people firing talking points at one another, each convinced he’s right but never connecting with the other on mutual terms.

Our social-media arguments, comment-box chatter, and water-cooler debates are, sadly, rife with this volleying of words. The question of whether Muslims and Christians worship the same God is no exception.

Of course they do! There’s only one God!

Of course they don’t! Christians believe that God is a Trinity. Muslims don’t. End of story.

Vatican II said that Muslims worship the one, merciful, just God, just like we do. This is official Catholic teaching.

Christianity’s God is love. Islam’s God commands his people to kill and subjugate unbelievers. How can they be the same?

Muslims sincerely believe that they worship the God of Abraham, so how can you say they don’t?

The “revelation” that Muhammad received could only have come from a demon. How can you say that a demonic religion worships the same God as Christianity?

And on it goes. Depending on how you define the question, you come up with a variety of equally sure-sounding answers. By not defining the question, even just temporarily for the purposes of discussion, we fail to recognize that the question could be legitimately answered in more than one way.

This occurs every day in sports arguments. Who is the greatest baseball player of all time? Was it the player with the most hits or home runs, or the best advanced-stat metric? Or was it the guy with the most championship rings and intangible winning qualities? How do you compare offense versus defense, pitchers versus everyday players, team success versus individual numbers? How do you account for the differences in eras across baseball history—dead-ball, juiced-ball, high-mound, low-mound, pre-/post-expansion, the DH, the effects of nutrition and steroids, the depth of the talent pool and quality of competition?

Yes, baseball fans can be quite geeky.

Now, sports arguments are usually about the journey rather than the destination. Most people understand that there is no divinely assured single answer to the question of who the best baseball player is, but they enjoy the mental exercise of talking about it. (Plus, for men especially I think, it’s fun to bump egos and try to win over someone to your favorite player’s camp.)

And yet we persist in asking—and answering—this question of Muslims, Christians, and God as if there had to be a single normative answer. Not just a single logical answer, in fact, but a single Catholic answer that demands our religious assent.

Let me suggest that the question we should be asking instead, after first acknowledging that there are multiple ways to address the larger matter, is this: “Which answer offers the most helpful way for Christians to regard Islam and Islamic theology?”

Some people will say it’s best to stress kinship with Muslims as fellow monotheists—whether as part of a strategy of alliance against global secularism or because they think common ground and positivity should always come first for Christians in dialogue with other religions. Or that even though the Quran is not inspired, it claims to play in the same ballpark as Christian salvation history and so we must consider Muslims as at least distant cousins on Abraham’s family tree. In some of these senses or others, they’ll say the best answer is yes, same God.

Others might say that even though the Quran features many of the same characters, places, and basic stories as the Bible, and the Quran’s Allah has some attributes in common with our God, in many other ways Islam’s God is so alien in nature and behavior to Christianity’s, and its followers so chronically hostile to the followers of Christ, that the best answer to our question is one that emphasizes estrangement, not kinship, between our two religions. They might add that this moment in history, when the Christian West is frittering away its identity while the Muslim world grows ever stronger and more invasive, is not a moment for Christianity to cloud its identity further while legitimatizing Islam’s. In some of these senses or others, they’ll say the best answer is no, not the same God.

I gave my own take on this matter two years ago, and I still believe now what I offered then: that the most helpful way to slice the “same God” question is by looking at revelation and relationship. In short, we worship the God we do because we know him. And we know him because we have his inspired and inerrant revelation about himself. Through it he speaks to us, introduces himself to us.

But Islam explicitly rejects that revelation and replaces it with a false substitute. That makes Islam’s God, despite whatever true things that the Quran says about him (whether gleaned from reason, plagiarized from Scripture, or captured by Muhammad’s imagination), a false God. According to what I think is the most helpful way of defining the question.

A quick analogy: Let’s say you and I have a mutual childhood friend named Bob. One day, you move away and lose touch with Bob, but I stay close to him. After twenty years, you and I get together and Bob’s name comes up. I tell you all the things that Bob has done since you saw him last. For instance, he joined the military, served some time in combat, then got married and had a family.

“I can’t believe Bob did those things,” you say. The Bob you knew was a shy, peaceful guy, and you were sure he’d remain a bachelor. Now we have two different pictures of Bob’s identity, but only because mine is more complete. We both still know the same Bob.

If Bob is God in this analogy, then I’m Christianity and you’re Judaism. We think somewhat differently about God because I’m more up to date on his actions and what they say about him, but it’s the same God we both know from way back. My picture of him is simply more filled out. He has revealed more to me.

Now, what if you never met Bob at all, but only pretended to—by putting together bits of info you learned from Google and making up a bunch of other stuff? What if you came to me out of the blue and claimed that this same Bob never really did a lot of the things I know he did, and that he did do all kinds of other things I never heard of, but that he was nonetheless the same exact person I claimed (fraudulently, you say) to be old friends with?

This time you’re Islam. Do we know the same Bob?

Written By Todd Aglialoro



  1. Patrick Gannon Reply

    So glad to see that the Church is not wavering in its goal to make Christianity the “religion of hostility to the other.”

    It’s almost like this site is in direct conflict with the Pope’s attempts (if they are real and not just marketing), to bring about more peace and harmony among everyone. Is this site sort of a back-door way to undercut the Pope, and continue to reinforce the close-mindedness and hostility of Christianity, and Catholicism in particular?

  2. Michael W Reply

    Hello Patrick Gannon. This is not being hostile. It is the TRUTH. Truth is Catholic Church is only the True Religion just like True science and false theories of science. Islam is false because they are following a false prophet named Mohammed does not attributed any divine authority.

    1. Patrick Gannon Reply

      Thank you for sharing your personal opinion. You can’t prove any of that with objective, empirical evidence. Nor can Islam prove its religion. It’s like the RCC arguing that unicorns are real and then criticizing the Muslims for arguing that fairies are real. All religion seems to do is poison things. It separates; it divides; it pits people against each other.

      The RCC is very confusing to me right now. Every time I read about the Pope, he’s trying to open lines of communication, apologizing for past transgressions, seeking to be less strident – and then I read the articles on this forum and it seems like the real goal is to take the Church back to the Iron Age. That’s what the Fundies apparently want to do, but I thought the RCC was slowly working towards modernity and increased humanity. Apparently not.

      1. Ronnie Buda (@rsjb63) Reply

        Patrick. Faith in Catholicism also involves reasoning. Reasoning provides us with objective proof such as archaeological evidence, historical witnesses, secular documents during that time, apostolic tradition/early church fathers from the time of Jesus to present. As for your comment about division and poisoning things, have you given any effort of research to the incredible amount of charity done by the Church? And not only charity, the incredible involvement (hospitals, education, etc.) the missionaries/Church had in the forming of Western civilization?

        1. Patrick Gannon Reply

          Ronnie, you said, “Faith in Catholicism also involves reasoning.” I disagree. Faith is pretending to know things you don’t know or don’t understand. Reasoning is understanding that there is no objective evidence, which is why belief and faith are needed in the first place.
          “Reasoning provides us with objective proof such as archaeological evidence, historical witnesses, secular documents during that time, apostolic tradition/early church fathers from the time of Jesus to present.” Reasoning is not objective proof; just as an argument is not evidence. Reasoning is simply the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. The archaeological evidence for the most part undercuts foundational parts of the bible. There is no archaeological evidence for a 6 day creation, a global flood or a mass Exodus out of Egypt. Reasoning tells us that given this lack of evidence, perhaps the book is not to be fully trusted. There are no historical witnesses for Jesus’ life or death. There is no historical corroboration of saints coming out of their graves and walking around, or the curtain in the temple being torn in half. There isn’t even a single solitary scrap of original text for any part of the bible. The archaeological evidence is not on your side.

          I’m afraid I must question the charity of the Church. It’s an extremely wealthy organization, most of its revenue is tax free, at least in the US. The Church however is responsible for requiring that those least able to afford large families, to do so, under threat of eternal torment if they use contraception. This creates the poor in the first place. You don’t get credit for helping to put out the fire on one side of the building when you’re throwing kerosene on the other end of the building. As for running hospitals and schools with a tax-free advantage; the Church is no fool – it’s a business, just like any religion. Jehovah Witnesses are in the publishing business. They all have an business plan to fill the pews and coffers, and the plans almost always include fear and guilt, often with a dash of hate for those that don’t believe what they do.

          I’m well aware of the impact the Church had on western civilization – much of which was a legacy of destruction and violence. I know that real progress in the west began at the enlightenment, when the authority of the Church was first questioned. Since then, our progress has come from protesting the Church on such issues as slavery, racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. Most of our societal advances appear to have come in spite of, rather than because of religion, including the RCC.

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories