15 Mar 2016 Asia-Pacific Middle East News Vatican Comments (1)

Pope Francis announces $1m Education Prize Award for Palestinian teacher

Hanan Al-Hroub, a Palestinian primary school teacher has won the Global Teachers' Award of $1million ( $1, 000, 000). Pope Francis announced the award himself.…

Read more

15 Nov 2016 News Vatican No comments

Bernini statue commissioned by Pope Alexander VII vandalised

The Elephant and Obelisk statue is situated near the Pantheon in Rome Police in Rome are investigating the apparent vandalism of the famed Elephant and Obelisk…

Read more

18 Sep 2014 Articles Comments (6)

On the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist

The doctrine of the Real Presence asserts that in the Holy Eucharist, Jesus is literally and wholly present—body and blood, soul and divinity—under the appearan…

Read more

21 Oct 2015 News USA Comments (1)

Denver archbishop: Would German bishops side with Henry VIII or Thomas More?

If divorced-and-remarried Catholics should receive communion, as Cardinal Walter Kasper and many of the German bishops suggest, does that mean St. Thomas More a…

Read more

14 Nov 2014 Q&A No comments

Doesn't 1 John 5:11-13 prove "once saved, always saved"?

Full Question The Bible speaks of believers as having eternal life now (1 Jn 5:11-13). This proves "once saved, always saved." Answer Sometimes S…

Read more

17 Sep 2014 USA No comments

Move Welcomed to Assist Low-Income Families With Child Care

Officials from the US bishops' conference are welcoming a government move toward providing funds to help low-income families receive child care.   The …

Read more

11 Nov 2014 Q&A Comments (8)

Choosing to end one's life

Question: I've been somewhat following this story of the young woman with, I think brain cancer is it, who is preparing to end her life in another month or so.…

Read more

10 Oct 2016 Articles Comments (1)

Burying the Denial of Jesus' Burial

In a recent articleposted here at the Catholic Answers blog, I showed why the hallucination and vision theories fail as explanations of Jesus’ resurrection. One…

Read more

12 Jan 2017 News Comments (1)

Free contraception to be offered to the poor in the Philippines

The Philippines is the only Asia-Pacific country where the rate of teen pregnancies rose over the last two decades Filipino President Rodrigo Duterte has order…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

The Born-Again Agnostic: Salvation, Part I

  • Written by:
  • 1 Reply

“Are you saved?"

It’s a question Catholics get all the time from “Bible Christians." The average Catholic replies with a resounding “I dunno."

But Evangelicals and Fundamentalists answer the question, “Yes, I am, since I’ve accepted Jesus as my personal Lord and Savior." They seem to know exactly what to say. Many of them add, “What’s more, since I’m born again, I can’t forfeit salvation. I have an absolute guarantee of getting to heaven."

Is their position biblical? Is it the traditional Christian position? They think so, but they’re wrong.

More tone than substance

Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are theologically conservative Protestants who pride themselves on a strict adherence to biblical teachings. They believe in the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible, and they say the Bible contains a complete rule of faith for Christians. They don’t believe the Church Jesus established has an authoritative teaching role; for them there is no magisterium.

When they differ with one another, it’s often more a matter of tone than of substance. One person might call himself an Evangelical, another a Fundamentalist, but their theological positions could be identical. When a difference is manifest, it is usually that Fundamentalists are more hardline than Evangelicals, more insistent on the sufficiency of the Bible, less inclined to cooperate with people whose faith differs from theirs, even if slightly.

But on the key issue of salvation, Evangelicals and Fundamentalists are in basic agreement. They say good works play no role at all in our getting to heaven—salvation comes through faith alone. Many Catholics, sensing something is haywire with that idea, counter by saying we earn salvation through a combination of faith and works. Which side is right?

Neither, actually

“Bible Christians" are wrong in claiming that all we have to do is “accept Jesus as personal Lord and Savior." The Bible nowhere says mere faith is enough. It teaches that we also must perform good works and avoid evil works (sins) if we are to gain heaven. But Catholics who think works somehow help us “earn" salvation are wrong also. Salvation is a free gift from God and can’t be earned. Good works don’t earn salvation for us. Instead, they help keep us from throwing salvation away.

It is only the authentic Catholic position (which is understood by few Protestants and, sometimes it seems, by even fewer Catholics) which takes into account the whole of the Bible’s teaching. And here is the key: The Bible must be taken as an entirety.

To the extent Evangelicals and Fundamentalists fall into doctrinal traps, it is because they take verses in isolation. Catholics can fall into the same trap. In distancing themselves from the mistakes of “Bible Christians," they sometimes take other verses in isolation and end up with a skewed theology.

Saved by faith in Christ

Fundamentalists in particular like to turn to Romans 10:9: “If you declare with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and if you believe with your heart that God raised him from the dead, then you will be saved." (Here and elsewhere I’m using the translation by Msgr. Ronald Knox.) Fundamentalists emphasize “then you will be saved," and they claim this verse by itself demonstrates that all one needs to do is to accept Christ as Lord and Savior. After that, nothing else needs to be done.

Many Fundamentalists go so far as to say no sin committed by a “born-again Christian," no matter how heinous, can deprive that person of heaven. This is an extreme if widely held position, and even many Fundamentalists find it viscerally unacceptable. They can’t help asking themselves, “Why shouldn’t an unrepentant and gross sinner go to hell, Christian or not?"

Other Fundamentalists take a slightly softer position, saying apostasy from the faith (which they understand to be the sin against the Holy Spirit) will lose the Christian his salvation, but nothing else will. Any other sin, no matter how grave, will not undo one’s salvation.

Still other “Bible Christians"—this is truer of Evangelicals than of Fundamentalists—admit, in what is really a contradiction to the “once saved, always saved" idea, that serious sins can in theory result in damnation, but they cover themselves by arguing that in fact the truly born-again Christian will not sin seriously and that any person sinning seriously could not have been born again in the first place, no matter what he or others thought.

How can one know?

Thought out logically, this leads to a kind of agnosticism. You can’t know if anyone, even yourself, is really born again until death intervenes and prevents the commission of a serious sin. This inability to know for sure who is saved and who isn’t undercuts the assurance of salvation that “Bible Christians" claim for themselves. They can’t be sure of their assurance until they’re safely dead, which means they have no assurance at all. Most of them don’t realize the problem with their position.

I once asked a Fundamentalist if his minister were a born-again Christian.

“Of course," he said.

“And that means you and he are sure he’s going to heaven?"

“That’s right."

“But what if he commits a serious sin, such as a murder, twenty years from now and dies unrepentant?"

“That would show he never was really born again," the man replied, unfazed.

By Karl Keating


1 comment

  1. Eric H. Reply

    “I once asked a Fundamentalist if his minister were a born-again Christian.
    “Of course,” he said.
    “And that means you and he are sure he’s going to heaven?”
    “That’s right.”
    “But what if he commits a serious sin, such as a murder, twenty years from now and dies unrepentant?”
    “That would show he never was really born again,” the man replied, unfazed.”

    My brain quite literally is screaming in anguish over this little exchange. How then do we evangelize someone with such an obvious lack of understanding in basic philosophy?

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories