Follow usTwitterFacebook


16 Sep 2014 USA No comments

Deluge of criticism after abortion funding revealed in health care law

Washington D.C., Sep 16, 2014 / 02:02 pm .- Pro-life groups have responded forcefully to a new report finding that despite promises from President Barack Obama,…

Read more

11 Jul 2016 Articles No comments

A Message from Mars

The book's subtitle is Peace, Promises, and the Day They Take Our Money Away. No, it's not about the latest plan to hack away at the deficit. It's about the…

Read more

26 Mar 2015 Q&A Comments (2)

Was Mary of Cleophas the sister-in-law of the Virgin Mary?

Full Question In some old documents I found references to a woman named Mary of Cleophas, who was said to be the sister-in-law of the Virgin Mary. Is this …

Read more

01 Apr 2016 Americas Europe News United Kingdom USA Vatican No comments

Post-Synod Conclusions of Pope Francis to be released

The Vatican has announced that the Papal exhortation of Pope Francis on the Synod on Family will be released on Friday 8th April. The Synod which discussed the …

Read more

04 Jun 2015 Articles No comments

God or Atheism — Which Is More Rational? - Peter Kreeft

The conclusion that God exists doesn't require faith. Atheism requires faith. Is it rational to believe in God?  Many people think that faith and reason ar…

Read more

12 Nov 2015 News USA Vatican No comments

Fr.Fernando Karadima punished for molesting children claims he is innocent.

A prominent priest who was accused in 2011 by the Vatican of “sexually abusing minors”  yesterday, maintained his innocence, saying he’s not guilty of the offen…

Read more

28 Aug 2016 Articles No comments


It is certain that without the divine assistance we can do nothing good for our souls. God also has declared that graces are granted to those only who ask for t…

Read more

29 Nov 2016 Exhortations Comments (1)

Papal Advent advice: Don't be dominated by material things

The season of Advent is a reminder to us to open our horizons and have concern for more than just material things, the Pope said Sunday during his Angelus addre…

Read more

30 Sep 2015 Middle East News No comments

Christian schools reopen in Israel after month-long strike

The schools were closed to pressure the Israeli government to grant budgeting equality Christian schools opened in Israel on September 28 after an almost mon…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

The Pleasures of Riot

‘The urge to destroy is also a creative urge,’ wrote the nineteenth century Russian anarchist, Mikhail Bakunin.  He might, more accurately, have described it as an enjoyable urge: there are few sounds so gratifying to the producer of them as that of the tinkle of smashed glass, especially if there is no prospect of having to pay for it oneself afterwards.  In other words, there are usually economic and other disincentives that inhibit our inner vandal, which go into abeyance during a riot.Dr Eisold, in his blog for Psychology Today on why people riot titled Understanding Why People Riot, posted in October 2011, is worth re-reading in the light of the latest riots in Baltimore.  Dr Eisold recognises the joy of rioting.

I have observed it myself close up.  I once reported on a riot in Panama City in which I saw middle-class people throwing bricks through windows and making bonfires in the street.  I recognised one of the rioters dining in an expensive restaurant that same night after a hard afternoon’s vandalism.  No doubt he thought he had done his duty in furthering the cause of justice.

However, Dr Eisold also accepts Gustave Le Bon’s views, put forward in 1895 in his book The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, that membership in a riotous mob deprives people of their autonomy and causes them to do things that they would otherwise not do.  It is as if the mob had a collective mind of its own that determined how the individuals in it acted.  I do not agree with this.

Quite apart from the fact that rioters are a self-selected group, who are fully aware of what rioters are likely to do, and who are not forced to participate in riots, it is not true that individual rioters lose control of what they do.  The vast, vast majority of rioters do not kill, for example, and not all of them loot.  The middle-class rioters I observed in Panama smashed windows with pleasure, but did not run off with any goods; in the London riots of 2011, rioters smashed and looted every store in a street except the bookstore, the only one to remain with its windows and stock entirely intact.  The rioters had no use or desire for books and, notwithstanding their alleged loss of control were perfectly able to discriminate between the kinds of things they wanted and those they did not.  And when finally the police, who took a long time to intervene, arrested some of the rioters engaged in the gravest actions, it turned out that the majority of those had serious criminal records.

Dr Eisold is surely right when he says that riots usually break out after a serious incident has occurred, often after the commission of an injustice, or a perceived injustice, on the part of the authorities.  But even this needs to be approached more critically.

When the authorities fail to live up to the expected standard, when they commit injustices of their own, the chance is taken for a day out that combines the pleasures of destruction with those of moral indignation.

Would people with a genuine sense of injustice destroy the property or endanger the lives of people in no way connected with the injustice that is supposed to be the occasion of the riot?  During the Parisian riots of 2005, for example, the rioters burned thousands of cars belonging to people very similar to themselves, and who lived in the same area as they.  This was hardly the manifestation of an acute sense of injustice.  If anything, it was a manifestation of wounded amour propre, for the rioters would never have rioted against the kind of injustices that people such as they committed every day, and that in fact had a far more baneful effect on their daily lives than injustices committed by the authorities.

In other words, they expect from the authorities a completely different standard of behaviour from that they exhibit themselves: they are children, and the authorities are parents.  When the authorities fail to live up to the expected standard, when they commit injustices of their own, the chance is taken for a day out that combines the pleasures of destruction with those of moral indignation.

In his article, Dr Eisold makes reference both to the social and economic frustrations of the rioters and to the events in Tiananmen Square.  But demonstrations are not riots, though they can be turned into such by extremists, and perhaps by the provocation of the authorities.  Nor is it true that every frustration is justified, or that it explains, let alone justifies, riotous and destructive conduct.  If frustration explained riots, we would all be rioters.  But even in riot-torn areas, rioting is not universal.

In his final paragraph, Dr Eisold makes reference to unbearable social conditions that allegedly are an underlying cause of riots.  But what is unbearable is not a natural phenomenon, it depends on (among other things) expectations, which may or may not be reasonable.  As Milton put it:

The mind is its own place, and in itself
Can make a Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven.
Therefore raw and unexamined claims of unbearability justify nothing.


Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories