12 Dec 2015 Articles No comments

"MITIS IUDEX DOMINUS IESUS" The Newly Reformed Guide to the Canonical Process for Declaration of Nullity of Marriage in the…


Read more

11 Sep 2015 News Vatican Comments (1)

Marriage – between a man and a woman – is under attack, Pope Francis says

Pope Francis told couples to defend God's design for the family as the union of a man and woman for the procreation of children, and urged them to be merciful t…

Read more

04 Sep 2014 Vatican Comments (2)

Pope sends letter of condolence to family of James Foley

Vatican City, Aug 25, 2014 / 07:25 am (CNA/EWTN News).- In a letter sent to the family of a U.S. journalist killed by ISIS last week, Pope Francis assured his c…

Read more

05 Sep 2016 Uncategorized No comments

On Mother Teresa’s feast day, cardinal praises her defence of the unborn

Cardinal Pietro Parolin said St Teresa would not bow before 'the fashions or idols of the moment' Love for those society considers “useless" or even a bother l…

Read more

03 Jun 2015 Articles Q&A Comments (1)

What are the Church’s guidelines concerning genuflecting during Mass?

ISSUE: What are the Church’s guidelines concerning genuflecting during Mass? What other guidelines does the Church provide regarding reverence toward the Blesse…

Read more

05 Oct 2015 News Vatican No comments

Pope opens Synod of Bishops with call to blend tradition with mercy

Pope Francis opened this year’s Synod of Bishops on the family Sunday with a stirring defense of traditional marriage coupled with an insistence that the Church…

Read more

10 May 2016 Articles No comments

If You Want Justice, Work for Chastity

At the height of the counterculture of the late 1960s and the flower-power desire for peace, Pope Paul VI said "If you want peace, work for justice." It remains…

Read more

19 Jan 2016 News Vatican No comments

Pope Francis met with Royals of Monaco

The Holy Father on monday met with Prince Albert II and Princess Charlene of Monaco. A brief Vatican statement released after the meeting indicated that the …

Read more

30 Dec 2015 Q&A No comments

Who were the Church Fathers?

Full Question Your magazine frequently refers to the "Fathers of the Church." Who were these men, and what did they do to earn the title? Answer…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Why can’t women be ordained priests within the Catholic Church?

Full Question

Why can’t women be ordained priests within the Catholic Church?


The Church does not have the authority to ordain women. In his apostolic letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, Pope John Paul II declared “that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women” (4).

Some of the reasons cited include:

  1. The example recorded in the Sacred Scriptures of Christ choosing his apostles only from among men
  2. The constant practice of the Church, which has imitated Christ in choosing only men
  3. The Church’s living teaching authority has consistently held that the exclusion of women from the priesthood is in accordance with God’s plan for his Church.



  1. Renee Reply

    I do not at this point agree with women being priests; however the reasoning listed are not sufficient. In Jesus time, what as the role of women? History can change. (Has no ben, thus will never be)? Someone told me a really good reason once but I do not remember it at this time. Will write it when think of it.

    1. Jill Tomlin Reply

      I thought the reason was that at the Concercration the priest becomes one with Jesus and Jesus was a man.

  2. Patrick Gannon Reply

    Funny how no women were involved in any of those decisions…

  3. Hazel Armstrong Reply

    What was the sex of the first person to tell others of the resurrection of Christ?

    1. Patrick Gannon Reply

      Male. LOL. The first to speak of Jesus’ resurrection was probably Cephas or Paul, who both learned of this resurrection through revelation. The author of Mark later turned a celestial god, Jesus, into a (invented) real person by inventing a birth, baptism, disciples, ministry, sermons, miracles – none of which Paul knew anything about. Paul did not know of a real person, and he was the first writer – in the 50s. The author of Mark, around 70 AD appears to have invented the character of Jesus and Matthew and Luke embellished from there.
      However since you probably won’t accept the idea that Jesus was a mythical person, then let’s turn to the first gospel, and the author of Mark. Scholars universally agree that Mark was the first gospel written around 70 AD. That author, says the first person to tell anyone that Jesus had risen was a young man:
      5 And entering the tomb, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, dressed in a white robe; and they were amazed. 6 And he said to them, “Do not be amazed; you seek Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified. He has risen, he is not here; see the place where they laid him. 7 But go, tell his disciples and Peter that he is going before you to Galilee; there you will see him, as he told you." 8 And they went out and fled from the tomb; for trembling and astonishment had come upon them; and they said nothing to any one, for they were afraid.”

      I like that part at the end about how they said nothing to anyone, yet somehow we know the story!

      1. James Russell Reply

        In Galatians 1:18-19 St. Paul describes meeting “James, the brother of the Lord.” Strange for a celestial being to have a flesh and blood brother St. Paul might meet. St. Paul also repeatedly emphasizes the death by crucifixion of Jesus and his physical resurrection, e.g. 1 Corinthians 1:23, 1 Corinthians 15.

        If you put such great stock in the work of secular scholars you should know that the overwhelming consensus of secular scholars is that the “Jesus Myth” theory is ridiculous nonsense.

        1. Patrick Gannon Reply

          Are you a Catholic, James? If so, then you know that from a Catholic perspective, Jesus had no brothers or sisters because his mother was a perpetual virgin. (Nonsense if you ask me, but that’s what the RCC teaches). So if you are a Catholic, you can’t argue that point. If you are a Protestant, then you can argue that Jesus had brothers and sisters and that this passage refers to a brother. A number of scholars, however would disagree with you, and say that “brother of the lord” was an expression that Paul used to refer to believers, to followers of Jesus, in the same way he refers elsewhere to “brethren of the lord,” to refer to followers. It’s hard to imagine that Paul wouldn’t make the most of having a “real” brother of a “real” Jesus to refer to as a “real” source for his information, making this point crystal clear to those he was trying to convince; but Paul’s information about Jesus does not come from other people, and he is insistent on this. When taken in context with the rest of Paul’s letters, it seems evident that Paul is not speaking of a real flesh and blood, Jesus.
          1Cor 1:23 “23 but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling block to Jews and folly to Gentiles,” There is nothing in that passage to indicate a terrestrial crucifixion. There are no details at all.
          1 Cor 15 does not include the word “crucifixion;” it just says he died, and it does not indicate whether this death was on this earth or in the firmament. The evidence for the resurrection is not from any person but only “according to the scriptures.”
          Paul knows nothing of Jesus, except what he received by revelation, and “according to the scriptures.”
          While it is true that a decade ago, scholars leaned towards a historical Jesus, that trend is changing. Back when I was a kid, the Exodus was taught as history, but starting in the 70’s we began to realize that the story was not supported by real history and certainly not by archaeology. In the scholastic community, it is well recognized that Moses is a mythical figure today. With regard to the mythicism of Jesus – we’re basically at the same place scholars were in the 70s with regard to Moses. I predict that a couple decades from now, it will be well accepted in scholarly circles that Jesus was a mythical person.
          The best evidence is probably Richard Carrier’s “On the Historicity of Jesus,” a peer-reviewed report of the available evidence; and some of the most damning evidence for Jesus being a myth comes from the NT itself. While I reached a point, after I read the bible, that I realized Jesus was not a god, I still thought he was a real person, who was turned into a myth by the early Church, but after looking at all the evidence, it seems he was a myth, who was made into a person. The odds are slim that Jesus was a real person according to the Bayesian methodology Carrier uses to gauge the likelihood that Jesus was mythological vs historical, and Carrier constantly gives historicity the benefit of the doubt. Do yourself a favor and read his book – it’s what you’re up against.

Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories