27 Feb 2016 Asia-Pacific News No comments

Archbishop William Goh voices concerns over Madonna’s upcoming concert in Singapore

Singapore's Archbishop has voiced grave concerns over pop diva Madonna’s concert this Sunday in Singapore. He reminded Catholics that it was their “moral obliga…

Read more

23 Jun 2015 Articles No comments

Why the religious kill

It is said that 1989, the year of the collapse of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War, marked the final act of an extended drama in which first religion…

Read more

24 Jul 2015 Articles Q&A Comments (1)

How can I know God's will for my life? What does the Bible say about knowing God's will?

Answer: It is important to know God’s will. Jesus said that His true relations are those who know and do the Father’s will: “Whoever does God’s will is my brot…

Read more

31 Oct 2014 Articles Comments (2)

More Stumpers for the Jehovah's Witnesses

Some core beliefs of the Jehovah’s Witnesses (JWs) were examined in our tract entitled Stumpers for Jehovah’s Witnesses. In this "sequel" tract, we will examine…

Read more

02 Oct 2015 News Vatican No comments

Vatican clarifies background on Pope's meeting with Kim Davis

After meeting with Pope Francis earlier this morning Vatican spokesman Fr. Federico Lombardi confirmed that the Pope met with Kim Davis and her husband as part …

Read more

04 Jun 2015 Articles Q&A No comments

What does the Church call sacred and why? What is the proper use of the sacred?

Response: According to the Code of Canon Law (Codex Iuris Canonici , c. 12-5), a place is said to be sacred if it is designated for divine worship. Such th…

Read more

02 Sep 2015 News Vatican No comments

First Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation: liturgy in Vatican basilica

Pope Francis presided on September 1 at the first World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation, with a Liturgy of the Word in St. Peter’s basilica. The servi…

Read more

25 Aug 2016 Uncategorized Comments (3)

May Catholics ever marry non-Christians?

Full Question Is a Catholic allowed to marry a non-Christian under any circumstances? I know Scripture states not to be unequally yoked with unbelievers, b…

Read more

02 Jun 2015 Vatican No comments

Cardinal Pell: I did not try to bribe child abuse victim

Cardinal George Pell has strongly denied allegations that he tried to bribe a victim of clerical child abuse, that he ignored another victim’s complaint, and th…

Read more
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Why weren’t all priests able to absolve the sin of abortion already?

Q. I’m curious about the fact that to mark the Year of Mercy, Pope Francis will allow all priests to absolve the sin of abortion. Why isn’t that true already? If I had committed such a sin, then went to confession and found that the priest couldn’t forgive me, that would turn me off from the Catholic faith. (Quincy, Massachusetts)

Q. I just read about Pope Francis permitting priests to absolve the sin of abortion, “a power usually reserved for bishops." First, are there other sins that are reserved to a bishop to forgive, and what are some examples? And second, before the pope extended this new authority, what was the procedure a priest was supposed to follow when someone confessed an abortion? (Fayetteville, Georgia)

A. Pope Francis’ announcement did prompt some questions — mainly because in the United States, it doesn’t change the present practice at all.

For at least the past 30 years, bishops in the United States have granted to their priests the power to lift the automatic penalty of excommunication attached to procuring an abortion.

A key point — lost in some of the reporting — is that Catholic priests anywhere in the world already have the power to forgive the sin of abortion. The penitent walks out of the confessional forgiven and reunited to God’s grace.

The issue here is not the sin itself, but the excommunication, and who can lift it. In the Code of Canon Law that power is reserved to a bishop — unless, as in the United States, he has chosen to extend this authority to his priests.

In parts of the world where that power had not been granted, the priest would have forgiven the repentant sinner immediately and then have asked the penitent to return at a later time; during that interval the confessor would have secured his bishop’s permission to lift the canonical penalty. (Anonymity, of course, would have been honored, with the identity of the penitent never disclosed.)

In order to incur the excommunication, the penitent must have known prior to the offense that such a canonical penalty was attached to the sin — which would seem to be true only in a minority of cases.

You asked whether there are other sins for which lifting the canonical sanction is reserved to the bishop, and there are. Among such grave offenses are desecrating the sacred species of the Eucharist, absolving an accomplice in a sexual sin, or violating the seal of confession.

Finally, the pope’s announcement was not intended in any way to minimize the gravity of abortion, which takes a human life, but to highlight the wideness of God’s mercy and his willingness to forgive anyone who is genuinely sorry.

Q. I had been absent from Mass (but not from prayer) for a number of years. I began attending again last year and noticed that the words of the consecration had changed.

The word “cup" is now “chalice." I thought this odd, since the drinking vessel at the Last Supper was more likely an earthenware cup. I asked a deacon the reason for the change, and he said it was so that the service would sound more “high church." That upset me, because Jesus came from humble origins and lived that way throughout his life. Would the Church be happier if he had drunk from a golden goblet? (Harrisonburg, Virginia)

Can suicide be forgiven?
Should I go to confession if I can’t remember my sins?

Am I doomed because I was born out of wedlock?
A. Since I have no access into the minds of those who translated the new Roman Missal into English, I can only speculate on their reasons. (And I agree, by the way, that “cup" gives a more realistic picture of the Last Supper.)

One of the guiding principles was to produce a more formal and literal translation of the Latin texts, in the hope that this would bring added reverence to the celebration of the Eucharist.

When St. Jerome, around the year 400, produced the Latin Vulgate, his narration of the Last Supper used the word “calix;" while that word could have signified a ceremonial drinking goblet, more often in the secular Latin of the day it meant an ordinary drinking cup. (And Jerome knew that the Greek word in the original Gospel text also meant a “cup" used at normal daily meals.)

We are not sure of the exact composition of the cup used by Jesus; in the first-century Middle East, it might have been made from stoneware or an early form of glass.

The decision to change from the 1969 missal’s use of “cup" to the 2011 missal’s “chalice," as well as adhering more closely to the Latin, was perhaps designed to remind us that the vessel took on a new and sacred character since it contained the precious blood of Christ.

By The Rev. Kenneth Doyle


Leave a Reply

  1. most read post
  2. Most Commented
  3. Choose Categories