Can priests ordain priests?

Full Question

First Timothy 4:14 says that Timothy was ordained by priests. Doesn't that contradict the Catholic teaching that only a bishop can confer Holy Orders?


This verse does not say that Timothy was ordained by priests. At most, it says that priests laid their hands on him at the time of his ordination, but this does not mean that it was they who conferred the sacrament upon him. When someone is ordained to the priesthood, the bishop imposes hands on the candidate, followed by any already-ordained priests who are present. These impositions of hands have different significance. The bishop places his hands on the candidate to impart the Holy Spirit to him for ministry, to confer on him the sacrament of holy orders. When the new priest’s colleagues lay their hands on him, it is not to confer the sacrament, but to symbolize their union with him in the priesthood and their sharing a common Spirit through the sacrament. This explanation of the two impositions can be found as early as theApostolic Tradition of Hippolytus, which was written in the early 200s. In 2 Timothy 1:6 Paul states, “Hence I remind you to rekindle the gift of God that is within you through the laying on of my hands.” Timothy’s ordination was received through the laying on of Paul’s hands, and Paul had the powers of a bishop as part of his powers as an apostle. Thus someone of episcopal rank ordained Timothy. If 1 Timothy 4:14 means that presbyters (priests) laid their hands on Timothy, it was the same situation as modern priests laying their hands on a candidate after the bishop actually confers the sacrament. Yet there is a question whether 1 Timothy 4:14 even refers to priests laying their hands on Timothy. In most modern Bible translations the verse is rendered this way: “Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophetic utterance when the council of elders [presbyters, priests] laid their hands upon you,” but the verse can also be translated this way: “Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given to you . . . with the laying on of hands for the presbyterium [priesthood].” In other words, the laying on of hands was to make Timothy a member of the priesthood; it was not the priests who laid their hands on him.


Leave a Reply
  1. Many times people here have commented about the non-catholic Advertisements in these feeds. This time there is a non-denominational church advertisement….why?! Please respond!

  2. I have a genuine question. In the epistle of Timothy, it clearly states that a bishop must be a man of a good and clean conduct,charitable, loving,not a drunk etc, then it goes on to say that he must have full control of his family. (i assume he must be a good husband) ,FOR if he cannot control his household, HOW can he look after the family of GOD.?This has always baffled me, especially when i get to answer back to a protestant. I would really like a solid answer.GOD bless all.

    • This was with regards Bishops who were married men before being ordained. As St Paul said, it is greater for clergy to be unmarried, yet for a few centuries it was permitted. Still is for some Eastern Rite clergy. Permitted, though not perfectly ideal.
      (Married men without dependant children becoming priests/Bishops, that is. No clergy in history has ever been ordained then later married).

Leave a Reply Brethren !





Written by Raphael Benedict

Bishop, Priest, and Deacon; What's the difference?

Why was Thomas allowed to touch the risen Jesus, but Mary Magdalen was not?

Why was Thomas allowed to touch the risen Jesus, but Mary Magdalen was not?