If the deuterocanonical books don't claim divine inspiration, how can they be included in the Bible?

By November 15, 2014 6 Comments

Full Question

None of the books of the Apocrypha, what Catholics call the “deuterocanonical” books, claim to be divinely inspired– therefore they cannot be inspired and do not belong in the Bible.


No book of the Bible claims itself to be divinely inspired. Divine inspiration means that God himself authored the exact words of the text (using the human writer’s mind, personality, and background), and no book states anything like, “The words of this book were chosen by God” or “This book is divinely inspired.”
The term “inspired” (Greek, theopneustos) only occurs once in the Bible (2 Tm 3:16), where we are told that all Scripture is inspired. We first know that something is Scripture and then infer that it is inspired; we do not first know that it is inspired and then conclude it is Scripture.
The only non-technical references to inspiration occur when one book of the Bible reports that God or the Spirit spoke through the words of a different book (for example, see Heb 3:7-11, concerning Ps 95). In no case does a book of the Bible state this for itself. Even if it does claim to contain divine revelations or visions (as does the book of Revelation), it does not say of itself that every word of its text was inspired. That is something we must infer from 2 Timothy 3:16. Since no protocanonical book of the Bible meets your test, it can scarcely be expected of the deuterocanonical books.
Claiming to be inspired is a different thing from really being inspired. The Book of Mormon claims to be the Word of God, but isn’t; the Gospel of John doesn’t, but it is. To determine inspiration, one must use an external authority for verification, and the Church is the only institution that can be that external authority.


  • nkemdi David says:

    Catholics have the right word for it: Proto- First

  • nkemdi David says:

    Catholics have the right word for it: Proto- First-, and Deutero- Second-. The progenitors of this argument never asked the all important quetion: How did the book, yes, the Bible, came about? It’s like a situation where someone compiled a book and later edited it. He added some more to the New Edition and you are complaining! What right do you have to complain?

  • judithsinnott@hotmail.com says:

    2 Tim 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
    17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

  • […] If the deuterocanonical books don’t claim divine inspiration, how can they be included in the … How do we refute those who say only the Bible’s authority is infallible? Does the Catechism encourage private interpretation of the Bible? Why won’t Jehovah’s Witnesses accept blood transfusions, even when their lives are in jeopardy? How can you say the Watch Tower Society is a false religion for changing its doctrines if the Catholic Church has also done so? Is it true Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that Michael the archangel and Jesus are the same person? How do we know that the Bible is not the sole rule of faith? Would be appropriate for a Catholic to pledge allegiance to the Bible? How can I show that Jehovah’s Witnesses are wrong about birthday celebrations? What’s a good way to steer a conversation with Jehovah’s Witnesses who come to my door? Bible different from Jehovah's witness claim […]

  • lyton says:

    I would lyk to know about microchip nd rev 13 according to the catholic church.

  • John Smith says:

    If this means anything or not let’s have at it. The first man who is known to have died & BEEN ELEVATED TO HEAVEN WAS THE thief WHO DIED WITH Jesus ON THE CROSS. HE NEVER READ THE DIFFERENT SCRIPTURES OF THE BIBLE, BUT BELIEVED & WAS FORGIVEN….

Leave a Reply to nkemdi David Cancel reply