The Futility of Starting Your Own Church

The Church Comes Home is a book about the ultimate in atomistic Christianity: starting your own church in your own home. The authors are Robert and Julia Banks. I found an advertising blurb used to promote the book to be unintentionally instructive:
“Home churches are as old as the New Testament, and now the Bankses help you carry on the tradition in your community of faith! Discover how to start a home church of your own, determine doctrine, form a network with other home churches, and more!”
“Determine doctrine”? Isn’t that the essence of every offshoot from the one, true Church of Christ?
Martin Luther determined that there is no purgatory (good-bye Maccabees!) and that works play no role in salvation. John Calvin determined that God creates most men precisely to send them to hell. Charles Taze Russell determined that there is no hell and that you won’t go to heaven if you don’t worship at Kingdom Hall.
Joseph Smith determined that any man can become a god and can populate his own planet. Mary Baker Eddy determined that death is a figment of the imagination. Ellen Gould White determined that the Mother Church is really the Whore of Babylon.
L. Ron Hubbard determined that we are descended from extraterrestrials and that Scientology courses help us achieve the state of “clear.” Jim Jones determined that it is proper for Christians to drink, en masse, poisoned Kool-Aid. Richard Dawkins determined that there is no God and that there is no doctrine higher than that. And so on.
What business did these people have in determining Christian doctrine—or doctrine of any sort? None, of course. Not a single one was competent to do so, as they so amply demonstrated. With a few exceptions, each was a sincere believer, sincerely believing some things that just weren’t so. Luther and Calvin, at least, were fairly well educated in theology, yet they were unable to determine doctrine accurately, having, like the rest of us, reasoning faculties that were impaired at the Fall.
Those in the list who ended their lives holding the oddest opinions had accepted, at one time, most of the basics of Christianity, but they kept reinterpreting those basics until they bore little similarity to what the earliest Christians believed (not a single one of whom, for instance, thought it right to commit ritual suicide).
No one, no matter how bright, no matter how well degreed, no matter how sincere, can expect to determine doctrine accurately on his own. Sure, anyone can get one or two or ten things right, by dumb luck if nothing else. But to get the whole corpus of religious truth right? No one has done it—on his own.
Only the magisterium of the Church—the bishops teaching in union with the pope—has been able to do it, but not because we’ve been blessed with bright bishops and popes. (Historically, some bishops and popes have been dim bulbs indeed.) The men who, in their ordained lives, make up the magisterium are able to teach rightly not because of any native skills they have and not because they have excelled in their university studies but because the Holy Spirit prevents them from making a botch of it.
Many times, throughout Catholic history, they have failed to teach anything at all, but, when they did get around to teaching formally and definitively—such as through ecumenical councils—they always ended up teaching truly. Never once did the bishops assembled in such a council enter the doors thinking, “What new doctrines can we invent today?” Or, at least, if any bishops did enter with such thoughts, their thoughts proved ineffectual.
When a pope speaks ex cathedra, or when the pope and bishops convene in an ecumenical council, what we get is teaching guaranteed to be correct because the deliberations are protected by the Holy Spirit. “He who hears you hears me,” our Lord told the apostles (Luke 10:16). “I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail” (Luke 22:32). The Holy Spirit “will guide you into all the truth” (John 16:13). It is the Church itself, speaking through the magisterium, that is the “pillar and foundation of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15).
This last attribution, by the way, is usually a surprise to Evangelicals and Fundamentalists. If you ask them what the “pillar and foundation of the truth” is, as likely as not, they’ll say, “The Bible, of course!” At that point you smile broadly, flip to 1 Timothy 3:15, hand them the text, and say, “Here, read this aloud.” Although they’ve read the verse any number of times, its meaning never made an impress—until now. I have seen any number of “Bible Christian” jaws drop as the verse is pondered. I almost expected to hear, “Where was this hiding?”
What all of these verses are talking about is the infallibility of the Church. Infallibility is the inability to decide wrongly on an issue of faith or morals. It must be distinguished from impeccability, the inability to act wrongly. Catholics do not claim that popes, for example, are impeccable (sinless), and therefore the undisputed fact that popes sin tells us nothing, one way or the other, about whether popes can act infallibly.
There have been several unsavory popes—the tenth century is the best bad example—but none of them ever promulgated false doctrine, and some of them, surprisingly enough, were excellent so far as teaching the faith was concerned. (Too bad those popes didn’t mirror that teaching in their own practice!)
Infallibility is a charism that doesn’t belong to a bishop teaching on his own, to a pope teaching other than ex cathedra, or, at any time, to any priest, religious, or layman in the Catholic Church—and definitely not to anyone outside the Catholic Church, including the Reformers, today’s religious leaders, or even the well-intentioned folks who establish their own home churches.
It may be a grand thing to found a church of one’s own, but the sense of grandness will be diminished by the realization that ultimately it’s a futile exercise and one likely to lead to a cascade of errors and, thus, unhappiness. The only Church that matters—the only Church that is a real church at all—already has been founded and simply needs to be discovered, not replaced.
Written By Karl Keating

Raphael Benedict

Raphael Benedict is a Catholic who wants nothing but to spread the catholic faith to reach the ends of the world. Make this possible by always sharing any article or prayers posted on your social media platforms. Remain blessed

Related Articles


  1. absolutely…to know the HISTORY is to cease being a protestant…hard to digest directly but later they don’t have option to choose because TRUTH is only given to the Mother Church…the rest are just offshoot

  2. Great article. This explains exactly why I left the dis unified, everyone is their own authority protestant churches’. The non denominational/ home churches, the last stop for those desperately seeking truth before coming home to the catholic church.

Leave a Reply